Nay @ Nay @feddit.nl

Posts

2

Comments

171

Joined

5 mo. ago

I'm not usually an alarmist, but this one has the hair on the back of my neck up...

This feels like a false flag to target journalists spreading "misinformation."

I was reading the Atlantic article thinking 'What a bunch of dumb fucks." Until I read this part:

The Hegseth message goes on to state, “Waiting a few weeks or a month does not fundamentally change the calculus. 2 immediate risks on waiting: 1) this leaks, and we look indecisive

Hard stop right there. "This is intentional."

Then Tulsi comes out talking about "aggressively pursuing" journalists., and now P Heggs is just gonna play dumb?

Smells pretty bad, imo.

(False flag may not be the right term here, but I hope my point is still clear enough)

Seems like a play to make privatization more appealing. The big strong private sector can come to the rescue of the weak, leaderless USPS.

Entrapment..?

Your mom's a coward!

If you speak out about it you're seen as a "Radical" and/or "Leftist"

We have a bad bad case of "-That- would never happen -here!-"

How's that "Rule of Law" working out for us?

taps sign "Don't feed the trolls."

That was uncalled-for.

When did they invent the bomb?

So if he said "I'll end the war in 24 hours" sarcastically... Then he was mocking himself?

So many Ds of chess 🧐

Or just force.

That doesn't make any sense. Context always matters.

I hate this orange piece of shit, but the context tells me he was talking about 2020.

"We have no problems with them as long as they come into the country legally!"

We live in a fking cartoon...

😭

Yeah... I think I'm just being naive.

Yeah... With trump the black and white letter of the law doesn't matter... I think I'm just being naive. 😭

I read the bill and it didn't have anything to do with silencing critics. It was focused on "Intimate imagery" both real and AI. Am I missing something?

It'll be sooner, I think.