NateNate60 @ NateNate60 @lemmy.world

Posts

19

Comments

1,118

Joined

2 yr. ago

Bullshit.

Every programmer knows that 'A' in ['A', 'B', 'C', 'D'] would be the 0th item; the first item is 'B'

Rulers measure cardinal quantities and not ordinal ones. There is no cardinal numbering scheme that starts at 1, all of them "start" at 0. For ordinal numbering schemes, the symbols are arbitrary anyway and you can start with whatever you want. It's equally valid to start with 1, 0, -1, A, or "aardvark". The only benefit to picking 1 as the start is to make it easier to count with your fingers while picking 0 lets you easily convert an ordinal quantity to a cardinal one.

It is a war crime to intentionally attack non-combatants.

Frankly, most communist parties around the world that try to fight the government and take over violently get brutally crushed.

You cannot launch a violent revolution without popular support, and the reality is that absent extreme circumstances, the population as a whole at any given time will view the policies proposed by most communist parties as extreme. That is why it is so exceedingly rare for communist parties to be able to win power democratically, because the truth of the matter is that communist policies are usually deeply unpopular.

I do not care whatever your intentions may be; if you try to impose your ideology on the population against their will by violence, I equate you to the fascists. And indeed, many of the so-called socialist regimes that have popped up after these "worker's revolutions" have been tinpot dictatorships with the socialist decorations, while extinguishing personal liberties and badly mismanaging the state economy. And the promise of equality is totally betrayed as the party leadership becomes the new bourgeoisie, living in luxury off others' labour while the workers' living standards remain much lower.

Simply put, just because a hammer and sickle was installed atop the state buildings, the flag drenched in red, and the Evil Bourgeoise Government renamed to the People's Evil Bourgeoise Government doesn't make it any better.

I am a socialist and also Chinese, and I believe fellow socialist George Orwell's Animal Farm is shockingly illustrative of the situation.

I don't have a problem with snaps as a technology. If you want to use them, then who am I to judge?

But what I do have a problem with is when I don't have a choice and I am being forced to use what the distro maintainers think is good for me. That is what finally made me quit Ubuntu and switch to Fedora.

No, I would not. In an ideal world, Corbyn would still be the leader of the Labour Party while Starmer would head a moderate centre-left or centrist liberal party, and after the 2024 election, it would be Corbyn and Starmer governing together in coalition, resulting in a government that is slightly more to the left than what it is now.

But the UK's system of elections is flawed and definitely not perfect, which prevents this.

Then let it be. A liberal or conservative society is nonetheless better than fascism. What you have described is merely a situation where socialist and social-democratic politics have been electorally defeated by conservative ones.

The KPD chose to pout and fight to the bitter end rather than recognising that because they lacked the necessary amount of influence in the Reichstag to control the government, they could not get what they wanted, nor anything near it, and could only, at best, get an extremely watered-down version of the policies they want, or even settle for the status quo to prevent regressive policies from being enacted. Or even accept a mildly regressive policy to prevent a fascist one from being enacted. This is what democracy is meant to do. You give a little, and they give a little, and hopefully, we can both get a little bit of what we want or at least reduce the amount of the stuff we hate. If all of your positions are rigidly uncompromisable, you will find that a well-designed democratic system will keep you out of government and relegated to the sidelines unless you actually hold the popular mandate.

If the choice is to saw off your left foot or saw off your head, you must choose the lesser of the two. Refusing to choose does nothing to help you, and the KPD refused to choose.

Rather than accepting this reality, the. KPD decided it wouldn't go down without a fight. Ultimately, they failed, and wouldn't get the chance to govern (or even exist in public) for another two decades. Only after finding external help in the form of the Soviet Union and its Red Army did the KPD finally get what it wanted, subjugating the SPD. The new SED was ushered into government, will of the electorate be damned.

In the end, both the KPD and the Nazi Party wanted to destroy the Weimar Republic because they knew they could not get what they wanted by playing by its rules. The key historical difference is that the Nazis succeeded.

I don't fault the KPD's leaders for what they did. After all, we here in 2024 have the power of hindsight that was not available to them. But in the end, we must recognise that the KPD's stubbornness certainly didn't help with the collapse of the Weimar Republic and accelerated Hitler's rise to power.

It is an uncomfortable position to be in when you are forced to criticise the decisions of those whose values you respect and agree with. But it must be done if the goal is to learn from history and not merely flaunt it.

I'm pretty sure if all Nazi voters instead voted SDP, Hitler wouldn't have risen to power. The only reason the Nazi Party had any appeal whatsoever is because fractured voting meant chaotic governments, weak and ineffective chancellors, and leaving the president with no choice but to issue emergency decrees just to keep the state apparatus in semi-functional condition.

The one way, the only way, given the composition of the Reichstag, that the Nazis could have been kept out of power is if the Communists were willing to swallow their pride and work with the Centre Party, moderate right-wing parties, and SPD to keep Hitler out of the Chancery. Instead, look what happened. Hitler was appointed Chancellor and purged the Reichstag of opposition. The Enabling Act wasn't passed because everyone wanted Hitler to have those powers. It was because you either voted with the chancellor or the SS would gun you down on the way back home.

That's the problem with today's so-called socialists. An absolutely myopic stance that what isn't perfect might as well be the worst thing on the planet.

Sorry for the pedantry, but the term for cancelling an executive order is to rescind or revoke them. Only legislation is repealed.

I am prepared to be downvoted for this, but I believe in Occam's razor here: do not attribute to malice what is adequately explained by stupidity

I think it is much more likely that nobody bothered to check their background until it was too late.

To be franc (or to be billion francs), France has enough money, guns, and United Nations Security Council seats to give Haiti the middle finger

If they nuke Ukraine into oblivion, they're not spending a single kopeck building it back. They'll engineer a second Holodomor to "get their money's worth" before that.

Interestingly, this law also paid the newly freedmen $100 to fuck off to Haiti

It's easy when you only pay workers five dollars a day, work them like mules for twelve hours a day, are building in the open desert, don't need to do environmental impact surveys, and use cheap building materials and workmanship that starts to fall apart after ten years

The Yakuza in Japan in past decades are a great example of what happens when organised crime does hire lobbyists

It was the UK that did that. In the US, slavery was abolished through straight up "property confiscation" (from the perspective of slaveholders)

France doesn't have "trillions". There is nothing that can be done to force France to pay, so demanding too large of a sum, even if justified, is a good way to get them to say "fuck that" and you get nothing.

It's a nuke threat. Again.

This comment is shockingly bad taste on a post about innocent civilians being bombed to death in a war zone.