Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)NA
Posts
1
Comments
1,891
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Common to see big businesses with multiple locations using P2P VPN binding together all sites like one big LAN. Perhaps not ideal from a security standpoint to have the client network so flat, but eh 🤷

    Usually a handful of extra important servers are behind an extra layer of firewall rules and/or on a different VLAN with limits on what devices can connect to them.

  • Also if you bring one onto a real network to pwn it you're probably deliberately not replacing it's DHCP server so you don't break static IP assignments (but you might fake the routes so traffic goes through you anyway with ARP spoofing, etc)

  • The constitution even says the president isn't immune and the federalist papers spells it out EXTREMELY clearly for any "originalist" to read.

    Honestly the courts should call out SCOTUS on lying and making an invalid ruling that the constitution does not give them the authority to make, then just acting like it didn't happen.

  • That's why I said only notable changes should need preemptive review (if any), everything else that's standard procedure would just be documented and OK'd after

    I agree it would have very bad consequences if the agency would get blocked entirely from acting

  • Like I said elsewhere, just make congress review use of delegated authority regularly and rubberstamp it if the agency is acting reasonably, otherwise they just give new directives wherever they deem fit.

    They might even let agencies notify select members of congress when changing any notable rules so they can decide if they want to call a legislative session or just OK it.

    That respects the division of powers in the constitution while still letting regulatory agencies do their jobs

    https://slrpnk.net/comment/9618565