Murvel @ Murvel @lemm.ee

Posts

3

Comments

494

Joined

2 yr. ago

One is direct, and the other is not. And you're right, one is not constructive, and the other is, that's not coincidence.

What 'immediate' even means in this context I don't know.

Yes, being indirect. Instead of saying: 'you did a bad job', say 'here are things you can improve for next time'.

On is confrontational and problematic, the other diplomatic and constructive.

Everything the author describes can still be accomplished by being diplomatic and understanding without being confrontational and direct. Plus, you build a better, more resilient team that way.

I'm not really sure the author learnt what he thought he learnt.

Yeah, what a consolation... fucking dystopian either way.

Using Spotify Flight thing

Bombardier would do well to look to their long-term goals; the potential of the Canadian aviation industry is great, and the F35 program got jack to do with it.

The SAAB Gripen, for example, would be built in Canada, maintained in Canada, and integrates with the SAAB Global Eye AEW&C, which, by the way, is built on the Bombardier Global 6000 aircraft!

It's described in the article; the suggestion is to keep a small fleet of F35 fighter/bombers and a bulk fleet of Gripen fighters. That complements their respective capabilities

It's a community project with support from Valve and Nvidia

Neat!

Yes, of the older variants

Because they are buying the newer version...

Yes, on the newer versions. The earlier versions still in use, have the Volvo engine installed.

The engine was originally of Volvo design

Gripen E is newer than the F35

They buy F35 because the US is the premier supplier of arms for NATO bar none.

Are you so blind to the fact that a bipartisan system cannot possibly represent the people. The Democrats haven't driven politics for the working man for a long fucking while...