A) Man has dreamt of Artificial Intelligence for decades now, often times very much realizing the capabilities (and dangers) of such technology
B) AI in its current form already support business, hobbies, creative work etc. The traffic and processing power needed is constantly rising.
I feel with a such a bold (and just incorrect) statement the article cannot be much worth to read.
I've seen videos of people throwing Fentanyl in the face of police officers, so for sure it happens. Fentanyl can be absorbed via inhalation, which is also why some police carry Narcan, even for personal use should they be exposed.
I know if I was a first responder I sure wouldn't want to be exposed to that nasty shit.
Of course the bombing campaign was purposed to pressure the Japanese government to surrender, but that it was, as you claim, so that the US didn't have to carve up Japan with the Soviets is a claim that lacks support, and I couldn't find that claim in your sources neither.
Your source states, based on your quote, that the atomic bombings would be unnecessary if the strategic bombing continued... and that's your argument for why the atomic bombings were unjustified?
It clearly isn't!
A) Man has dreamt of Artificial Intelligence for decades now, often times very much realizing the capabilities (and dangers) of such technology B) AI in its current form already support business, hobbies, creative work etc. The traffic and processing power needed is constantly rising.
I feel with a such a bold (and just incorrect) statement the article cannot be much worth to read.