This is the first I've heard of the pilot project, and it pisses me off. Someone finally said 'screw opinions, let't find out empirically whether ubi works or not', and conservatives reply with 'we don't need no facts. We already know!'
First one I tried was suse. Had it installed at an installfest (ah those heady days). But when I got it home it wouldn't work with my monitor.
Second I bought Mandrake, but couldn't get that to work either because I had lost my monitor manual and couldn't give it the vsync value for it.
First one I got to work was called LibraNet. That worked great for a couple of years until they stopped supporting it because it was run by a father and son team and the father passed away.
So then I chose suse again, hoping a bigger org wouldn't suffer the same problem. But then later there was some controversy I can't remember anymore (was it with microsoft?), so I switched to Kubuntu which I have been using forever, but am going to switch to opensuse very soon for various reasons.
Yeah, I've found some right wingers that are like that; on everyday practical terms they like all that sharing and stuff, but somehow don't connect it to the high-minded political ideals they like to talk about, Like two different topics to them.
So you're saying it would rely on each person to stay objective and use good critical thinking, instead of accepting the first thing they read and fall down an echo-chamber rabbit hole? Wikipedia definitely doesn't always get it right, but it does try to use a form of institutionalized objectivity.