Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)MS
Posts
0
Comments
377
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • My immediate gut reaction to this is pretty viscerally against it. I guess as a foster parent, I'm used to society being up my ass about my parenting decisions and I'm fine with that.

    I get it that it can be painful when you are told you are doing something wrong with raining a kid you love, but also, that's the whole point of a society. I think this policy would point society in the direction of making parenting become even more individualized than it already is in the US. "It takes a village" has lost all meaning in this country and we need to work towards making society feel invested in everyone's children

    I don't know what policies could lead to people without kids feeling more of a stake in how children are raised. Can't think of anything realistic. It's going to have to be a societal shift back. People don't want to be around other people's kids when they aren't allowed to have any say in how those kids are parented.

    People talk about other countries where it's not impossible for someone in the town to discipline someone else's kid. It's inconveniencable in the US because we treat parents as an unquestionable authority and kids are treated like property. Whatever we do, we need to figure out how to move away from hyperindividualism, greed, and selfishness being rewarded/encouraged.

    People being property and thus giving their owners an extra vote is a very republican policy now that I think about it...

  • Im Def racking up interest but I'm lowkey banking on student loans being forgiven before the extra interest becomes a problem. Like, I'm gonna assume that at worst I'm adding an extra year of payments, but that's going to be future me's problem in like 15 years.

  • I definitely don't qualify for finacial hardship in any sense of the term. I'm in the high end of middle class income. I've been participating in the not paying as a form of protest for student loan reform/forgiveness. I'll be relatively fine when payments of $500 a month start back up. It'll suck but not gonna put me into hardship.

    It's really about solidarity at this point cause I'll be in student debt for an insane amount of time. Then again, even tho I'm okay, I don't have much of a runway if I were to get an unexpected layoff

  • A bunch of congresspeople wrote official letters calling for her resignation after the hearing yesterday.

    I think we need more of upper management being held accountable when there major fuck ups. She might not have been directly responsible for the decisions on that specific day, but it happened on her watch. She'll be fine and get a cush job at some security company.

  • I mean, when you are director, it's only fair that your head is on the line if there is a major fuck up. I'm sure she made plenty of money and will turn around some cush job.

    We were a cow farting a county over from the entire future of US history changing forever. Doesn't suprise me that politicians who rely on the secret service lost faith in her ability to keep them safe

  • I think there is a difference between messaging and denial. I feel like the Biden campaign often goes so far overboard when presenting the positives that it comes across as dismissive and tone deaf. Kind of like how it's frustrating when someone in a debate doesn't actually answer the question but instead just pivots to talk about whatever.

  • Closed conventions weren't the worst. I'm honestly fine if the DNC were to just pick someone at the convention after backroom conversations. Def too late for there to be any sort of election. I'm personally hoping Gretchen Whitmer somehow gets the nomination