After I got diagnosed with some weight related shit, I turned my entire life upside down, am at a much healthier 150 lbs (68ish kg), and feel so much better, both physically and mentally.
Something disillusioning from the field of psychotherapy research: Our best, most interdisciplinary, low-threshold therapeutic strategies allow people to, on average, lose and hold the loss of up to 7-10% of the weight they've started with. Which isn't even enough to get most people out of the obesity range. What you've been through is exceptional. By far most people will never manage to lose that much, not even with professional help.
To put it this way: If we look at obesity like a mental disorder it's one of the hardest to overcome, harder than depression or anxiety.
I get why so many people share your opinion on this, I just feel like it's missing context. Because sure, physiologically its possible for a depressed person to "just go out more" or an anxious person to "just stop breathing so fast" or an overweight person to "just eat less and move more", but this is such an oversimplified way to look at how humans work and why they do what they do that is simply stops being correct. Every now and then you'll meet someone who managed to do all this just like that, but for the vast majority it's an unrealistic and unfair thing to ask.
Obesity is a chronic disorder and will continue to be until we get better treatments.
Nice Freudian slip you've got there. How you feel, indeed, does not make your reality real. You keep claiming it's a scientific fact while rambling about something no professional in the field would ever agree on.
At one point you've learned about one aspect of measuring (purely physical) development - the tanner scale - and decided to forever discard everything else. Keep rest assured this is not how the world or science actually works.
Back on reddit I was active in a psychology sub with a "no self help questions" rule. This was in place because the mods said we have no way of any kind of quality control relating the answers you might get. This is the internet, and some jerk will probably feel empowered giving harmful advice or straight up advocating pro suicide to be extra edgy. There was, however, an automod providing actual self help hotlines and websites from basically all around the world. While I tend to agree that Lemmy wouldn't be my platform of choice when it comes to actual mortal danger (like in the case of severe suicidal ideation) I feel like we could benefit from something like that over here.
I didn't start the rainbow, but as far as I could tell it was there before the flag. Your project is cool and all, but it's also kinda huge and swallowing a lot of smaller paintings which it, theoretically, could also be incorporating.
Personally I think there's enough space to create something nice together. If you'll allow the continuation of our rainbow we can help protect the star and make it extra pretty, maybe add some shading or bend around those places that are extra special to you.
Would it be possible not to destroy the rainbow? We're happily working around your flag and respecting the big star in the middle. No need for sabotage, really.
Now that's just incorrect. The people who enjoy the taste of plant based meat probably liked the taste of meat a lot, that's why they're seeking to replace it, but environmental and/or ethical considerations are important enough to them to justify a small loss or simply change in flavor.
Personally I think that if they really believe they have a message to the Muslim priests that they should then go to the Muslim priests in the middle east and burn the books, instead of hiding behind "freedom of speech" in a safe country.
The message is "this is allowed here, and it will stay that way". There would be no message doing it in a country without free speech, only violence.
I'm not saying I like that they did it, but I definitely want to live in a society where it's allowed to do so. There is no place in a modern society for relics. If people want to worship a book that's their private decision and should be without consequence for the rest of society.
As for “deniers” , I dont think people questioning all of this are deniers, they are simply asking legit questions. Remember, this Climate thing has been being pushed/sold to us for like 60+ years now.
If you deny 60 years of research how are you not a denier? The only people with doubts at this point have no clue about science, sorry.
Something disillusioning from the field of psychotherapy research: Our best, most interdisciplinary, low-threshold therapeutic strategies allow people to, on average, lose and hold the loss of up to 7-10% of the weight they've started with. Which isn't even enough to get most people out of the obesity range. What you've been through is exceptional. By far most people will never manage to lose that much, not even with professional help.
To put it this way: If we look at obesity like a mental disorder it's one of the hardest to overcome, harder than depression or anxiety.
I get why so many people share your opinion on this, I just feel like it's missing context. Because sure, physiologically its possible for a depressed person to "just go out more" or an anxious person to "just stop breathing so fast" or an overweight person to "just eat less and move more", but this is such an oversimplified way to look at how humans work and why they do what they do that is simply stops being correct. Every now and then you'll meet someone who managed to do all this just like that, but for the vast majority it's an unrealistic and unfair thing to ask.
Obesity is a chronic disorder and will continue to be until we get better treatments.