I know that the industry is horrific. I have battled internally with becoming a vegan. And this isn't a but, it's just something i thought about once when thinking about the argument that whilst in nature, animals eat other animals, its not the same as what we do as we farma dn torture animals to get the meat....
Its cats....
Cats torture their prey....
They play with it, and maim it and keep it alive for as long as possible so they can chase it, for fun...
And sometimes they just fucking leave it there when it dies.
Hey mate, its fine that you made a mistake. Dont worry. You dont need to admit it. I see you trying to brush past it by saying im too serious. You made an argument that missed the point of my comment. I know it embarrassing. And now you are trying to make out like im taking things too seriously to distract from your own failure.
Dont worry about it. Everyone sees you being a moron.
Yeah, i normally get that response when people realise they were mistaken and dont want to admit it.
I told you that it was identified as a troll. You were just as invested as me. You were trying to be condescending. You were ignorant and talking shit about a group of people that it's easy to shit on.
All i did was point out that shiting on minorities is bad, and you started shitting on furries.
Honestly, you can try as much as you like to tell me I'm being too serious, but you were an asshole and you know it.
I made a statement that they would lose more than just furries as customers. Which frankly is distinctly possible, if not probable. You made a separate claim that the number of people that would care about furries getting banned from a burger king would be very few. Which is not something you can prove, back up with any evidence or quantify is any real way. I refused to continue a discussion about how many people care about furries as it isn't really saying anything about my original statement, which, again, was only that people would care.
Also i get the impression you have a problem with furries. Based on the language you used. I may be wrong, but it doesnt seem likely.
If you can remove your own personal bias from the conversation and talk less about your opinion that no one cares about furries and more about the fact that banning anyone from any service based on them being themselves is a foul act and one that in most circumstances would piss off more than just those in that subculture then we can talk.
I suppose it could be a net gain, but they most certainly will lose furries and people who support others' rights to be themselves as customers.
But yes, overall, they may gain customers. Although i can't think of a time that i have gone somewhere to eat/shop or use a service more because they discriminate against something i dont personally like.
I can think of a number of situations where i have stopped using a service because they discriminate against something i support.
Found this out in school when someone wrote some less than acceptable words on the board in permanent marker. The teacher scribbled over it with drywipes, waited a few seconds and wiped it away.
They said it was because essentially drywipe marker is a permanent marker with solvents.
Apparently, this happened because people were following biden and kamala. When trump got in, those accounts changed hands and became trump and vance accounts. Apparently thats how they do it. They are accounts for the current president and vice president. Whoever that is.
Although honestly it would be funny if everyone went out and bout animal costumes and just piled into the place. Just order a drink and fill every seat and doorway in there.
It would piss them off and be hilarious all at once.
This will be a blanket filter on his name, not his age. And if anything they are trying to de-politicise gemini.
Not that i agree with that practice, personally.
But its not fair to say they are politicising age by omitting any responses related to a political figure.