Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)MR
Posts
10
Comments
311
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • You should read the article yourself. There license has nothing to do with AI. Quoting them directly:

    Creative Commons solves a particular problem for us -- how to encourage republication at scale without tying up staff in negotiating deals and policing unauthorized uses. We've found it an invaluable aid in building our publishing platform, in reaching additional readers, and in maximizing the chance that the journalism we publish will have important impact.

    You need to stop pointing at ProPublica as if you're copying them, because you aren't. They're using the license to encourage republishing their works. The first article linked in that post was published in 2009, long before the AI boom. I've gone over the license you link as well, and it doesn't limit AI either. That's something you seem to have fabricated yourself.

    The reason people are annoyed by you is because it amounts to spam. It could be client specific as well. In Sync, your link gets auto-expanded with a link preview, same as any link. A cool feature, I really like it. Except your spam is everywhere you are and takes up screen real estate. This is again where ProPublica differs. On the post you keep referring to, there is not a link to the license, just the lettering at the top of a lengthy article. As another user pointed out, it wasn't even posted by ProPublica, but reposted by an independent user.

  • It's the modern equivalent of posting on Facebook that you don't agree to Facebook doing x or y (Using your photos, binding you to new terms, etc.). The thought is that by posting the link on their comments, it will keep LLMs from using their comments for training purposes.

    It will not.

    Edit: Here's a great Ask Lemmy from a few weeks ago all about this https://lemmy.ml/post/15152684

  • The same reason people copy-paste a couple paragraphs about not accepting certain terms and conditions on Facebook thinking that it's some legally binding contract they're posting. In this case, the user is saying that LLMs are not allowed to train on their data and it will likely be on all their comments.

  • Tried IID Max's PLA+ since they were always posting discounts on Reddit. I've stuck with them since for anything that needs color, their filament is vibrant and I've never had any issues. Buying in bulk you're looking at roughly $10/kg. For my black I use Elegoo PLA. It has a nice sheen to it.

  • My wife and I moved recently. We don't have a dishwasher at the moment so we chose to have 4 sets of dishes unpacked total so we can make sure to keep up on dishes. 2 meals each uses all the dishes, so we're forced to clean them daily.

  • Pharmacy professional weighing in.

    You have absolutely nothing to worry about. Controls are monitored for what's filled. Like another user said, if you take them back the pharmacy will just destroy them, nothing is documented. There are often self-serve drop boxes for meds in pharmacies, look to see where they might be in your area (Most of the time it's a pharmacy, but can be elsewhere). Nothing is reported with med disposal.

    Gonna say as well that 10 tabs is absolutely nothing. 5-325 can come in bottles of 500 tabs, and seeing prescriptions for month-long supplies for chronic pain users is pretty common.

    The drug reporting watches for patient safety by making sure that a patient isn't getting multiple prescriptions (potentially at different pharmacies, or different prescribers) that could interact with each other. Let's say you take Oxycodone 5mg three times daily chronically. You get in an accident and the emergency room prescribes you Norco (your hydro/APAP 5-325). The monitoring tool lets them know that you're already on an opioid and to either change therapy or verify the additional dose with your PCP.

    Anyways I'm rambling. Long story short, you've got the least suspicious prescription. Nothing to worry about.

  • Printing the 1st layer slow is so important, forgot about that! I'm down to 25mm/s on my first layer. Nice and slow. A print with a large surface area (Like a sign) may take 15 minutes on the 1st layer, but it's definitely worth it.

  • Going by just the failed circular print, you definitely don't have a good Z offset. There's no smoosh there. Putting it lower will smoosh the filament into the print bed (Part of why the PEI sheet is textured. The filament smooshed in the texture helps hold it better than a flat print bed). The fact that you can see through your first layer is bad.

    The top layers of your other failed prints look good, so I say we can rule out under/over-extrusion.