Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)MR
Posts
0
Comments
126
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Yeah, for enterprise you aren't going to roll it out yourself. They'd use a partner company to help you set it up and configure it for their needs to ensure that it can continue to scale and provide monitoring solutions. It's too much for one person to do that.

    Where are you hosting it? Onsite? Megacorporation's clod solution? Your cable line? What's your data recovery plan? 200+ users can generate a lot of data. What's the security plan? You do know how to harden every aspect of each subsystem, right? What's the monitoring plan? Not just "is it down" but way more granular for each subsystem. How many tech and phone support people will be on call to help?

    You could probably roll it out in a way that would work, but at that scale you should really be using a pro. Especially for a "friend". Don't want a tech problem to kill that friendship.

  • Older Americans thank SCOUTS, GOP for not saddling us with your student debt,

    I don't want to pay for your shitty degree.

    This is a middle finger to everyone who didn't go to college because they couldn't afford it. So again it's going to be the poor paying for the middle/upper class.

  • Because the left has decided giving money to Ukraine is Good™ therefore anyone who has any other ideas about the situation is Bad™. Not to mention it's members of the party of Evil™ who believe something Bad™.

    Personally I'm for donating to Ukraine.

    You don't have to agree with them, but there are valid reasons:

    • Representation: My constitutes don't want X and I'm here to represent them.
    • Problems at home: We have a shitload of problems at home that could use that money.
    • Budgetary: If you think the debt / deficit is a pressing concern, see "Problems at home".
    • The Russians are the Good Guys™ (Takes some mental gymnastics to get there)
    • Escalation: Funding one side could lead to a bigger conflict
    • Isolationism: Not our problem. We're not the world's police
    • Pacifism: No violence, ever.

    And some not quite so valid "reasons":

    • The "other side" wants it, so I'll vote against it
    • My campaign contributor needs something.
    • This will help me get into the news/votes!
    • I can use this vote later to prove i'm not a "war hawk".
    • I got paid a lot!

    It can sometimes be hard to tell if a person's given reason matches their true reason, sometimes it's not. Your existing biases will influence what you think about that.

  • LOL, about half the points in the article are struck through now. Yet another "journalist" who doesn't understand how anything works getting angry how they way they imagine it works.

    That's some quality reporting "stackdiary".

  • Works the same as M-b for me (backwards-word)

    Make sure your /etc/inputrc or ~/.inputrc contains

     
            # mappings for Ctrl-left-arrow and Ctrl-right-arrow for word moving
        
        "\e[1;5C": forward-word
    
        "\e[1;5D": backward-word
    
        "\e[5C": forward-word
    
        "\e[5D": backward-word
    
        "\e\e[C": forward-word
    
        "\e\e[D": backward-word`
      
  • *Since those jobs can't pay enough what's wrong with replacing them with AI? Then they wouldn't be working in such poor conditions.

    Maybe they could learn to code to be prepared for 'Jobs of the Future'

    Once you AI has the ability to make "movies" then everyone will have the chance to make their own, something few people have the ability to do now. Isn't that gain much higher than a catering company closing?

  • I'm with them up until

    rising fears of how the industry might try to replace creative workers of all kinds with AI technologies.

    You can try to fight it, but it's coming.

    AI is a tool. It will be used. It will augment, not replace, writers and actors, at least for quite some time.

    AI is already being used.

    Might as well complain that nobody is buying your buggywhips.

  • Most of this stems from a misunderstand of how LLM work.

    The original work is not stored anywhere. No copy of it has been made. Just tons and tons of statistics used to inform models.

    Since there is no copy there is no violation of copyright. Again, no copy of the book is getting made. The content of the books is not stored "verbatim". The book is not copied. I don't know how many other ways to put this.

    Summarizing a book also does not require one to have "read" it, contrary to the complaint. I never read "The DaVinci Code", but I can give a summary of it.

    With assertions in the complaint being clearly false it's hard to take it seriously and it'll get chucked the first time a judge has to deal with it.

    Maybe Silverman would have a point if it were standard practice to pay royalties to people you get inspiration from. But she doesn't pay everyone who wrote anything she read, said anything she heard, or other comedians who influenced her. So why should someone influenced by her pay?

    If I read 100,000 books how do you determine "which one" I got inspiration from? Same situation here.