MountingSuspicion @ MountingSuspicion @reddthat.com

Posts

1

Comments

398

Joined

2 yr. ago

I wonder what went down for Laos to accept her. I guess her parents are from there but she was born in Thailand. In the article they mention that Laos is generally uncooperative with accepting deportations, so I am curious to see how it was even justified. People are just going to be sent wherever now? Obviously it's disgusting no matter where they're sent, but she's not even from there!

Are we not against means testing? When I say I'm anti means testing I mean it. Who sets that threshold? What if the politician has $X with no family but another has $X with three kids? Is it per capita? If they can afford security for 2/3 kids do they just pick their favorite/least favorite? Do we still train the security detail? Do they have the same access to safety measures as government security personnel? Is that a world you want to live in where private security firms can close down buildings for the safety of an ex politician? Those people are not beholden to Americans, since they're privately paid. What oversight are these private companies subjected to and who pays for that as oversight costs change? If we're going to talk about how small a percentage of our budget feeding kids is, that should apply to keeping politicians safe if deemed necessary. Plus, imho I don't think politicians should have to regularly and publicly disclose their net worth for the rest of their lives because they were elected to office at some point.

That used to be my belief until I saw reports to the contrary. I believe you can see in my comment history right after the election saying that Gaza was a big contributor, but basically all the analysis I've seen since points to that not being true, so I've changed my tune. Would love to see what you're looking at for numbers/polls.

Definitely. And as soon as you say something leftist you're accused of not voting or "throwing away your vote" so you can't complain. Like, I get it. "Have the day you voted for" etc, but libs are pointing fingers at the wrong people. I've said it like a million times before, but sooo many of my leftist friends reluctantly voted Kamala when they were vehemently opposed to her stance on Palestine and now feel like they sold out for nothing. Like, at least if they hadn't voted they could say they stood for something. Now they don't even have a high horse to ride into the apocalypse on. The way libs will break your spirit is wild. They have more energy to fight leftists than republicans.

Maybe, but pride centering mostly attractive young cis white men has been a huge point for years, with (to my recollection) #prideSoWhite becoming a popular hashtag/rallying cry. I wasn't on any social media outside of reddit at the time and even I saw people #prideSoWhite. Admittedly, both are issues, but I think the community understands that corpo sponsors are kinda necessary for the kind of pride people have become accustomed to, so generally the corpos get flack for sponsoring only a small "acceptable" portion of the community. I think asking community members to share the space with other community members has been the go to for resolving this, cuz you're generally not gonna get corpos to sponsor them directly. I could be misreading their comment though.

Maybe where you're at, but our pride was full of all colors of the rainbow and all walks of life. There were speeches from much older people talking about their joy when they were able to be married to their partner of several decades. There were people presenting from all over the gender spectrum. There were drag performers of all sizes and races and people who were just enjoying being themselves. There was a nonbinary artist with a beard in a dress that had a huge audience. It felt like a time to be around people who would love and accept you unconditionally.

To your point about the cis white gay men: There was a much older lady running a booth (not selling just handing out fliers) for a first time sponsor, and I had such a lovely chat with her. Her husband came to keep her company and they were both expressing how they never really knew much about LGBT stuff but seeing people there and the joy really affected her. I don’t know if she was anti lgbt before, but you could tell she was really moved by seeing people basically just being at a fair, but able to be themselves. She told me about a gay couple that stopped by with their kids and how happy the kids looked. She even asked me about the flags (our pride had like every lgbt flag under the sun as freebies). Sure, maybe she's only affected by the hetero seeming people that fit into the cis white 2.5 kids mold, but I really think it had an impact on her. So, to your point, sure I won't argue that the hot cis white guys are probably more visible/"palatable" at pride, but it's still a really important event for the community as a whole, and it's gotten more open and accepting every year.

I get it, but it would be great if we could've kept it as a party. The community has already fought so much. The floats were basically the only way some people understood that LGBT+ was mainstream and accepted now. Rainbow capitalism is bad, obviously, but it's still devastating to see even that get taken away. Our roots should never have had to be resistance and it's sad to see it's come back to that. Same with several other communities. Having struggle be thrust upon you just by virtue of who you are is terrible for mental and physical health. I was looking forward to seeing the next generation thrive. I don't want to see them in the trenches. I want them to party. I want them to celebrate. I want job fairs at pride to be full of the worst Fortune 500 companies desperately trying to recruit from the community. I want them to live normal lives where they're not othered just for being and pride had evolved into a celebration of that.

Thank you!

If you get anything together for na'scrivas, I'd love to see it! I love all the sharing of world building that the internet has brought to the hobby. So many different groups will interact with the same NPCs or locations because their GM saw a post about them online and I think that's so cool. Really adds to the shared language and community of the hobby.

I agree for the most part, but she did have some milquetoast neolib proposals that would have helped. Mostly things already seen in one form or another in Bidens build back better plan, but honestly it didn't matter. Her rhetoric was weak and her campaign was poorly managed. I saw SOOOO many ads requesting donations (lady, I don't have money to buy eggs and you're buying ad space, the optics are bad) and not one of them said anything of substance. I say time and again that Bernie got people to donate time and money they didn't have because they believed in his message. Kamala had no message. She had some plans, sure, but did not effectively communicate them. They were too little too late regardless, but it felt like her ads were lazy cash grabs that couldn't even be bothered to give out empty promises.

For what it's worth, almost all of them are ghost written. They tell someone some stories and sometimes what they want the narrative framing/arc to be and then never think about it again. I bet plenty of people have never even read their own books.

I'd really love for that to be the case (enough people caring about genocide to decide an election), but it just isn't. The data shows that people on the left still came out to vote and she lost a bunch of centrist votes or people who are seen as "low information"/unmotivated voters. Those people don't care about Palestine. They thought she was weird, or a DEI candidate, or just weren't inspired to get up and vote for her. I'm not saying she needs to go more centrist, but people like populism and she just didn't do it.

Honestly, her campaign already signaled that. This, if true, just reinforces it. It also reinforces that Biden was a bad leader, which he was.

Obligatory: I voted for Harris and Biden and dems down ticket every election since I've been old enough to vote.

A bit of a cop out, but I've been wanting to tinker with the homebrewery, so I just made a lil 1 page NPC sheet for fun. Not quite an encounter, not even a statblock lol, but I was tinkering so I figured I'd share.

As someone who uses AI image gen locally for personal use, 2-4 are actually really common issues that people run into. It's something people in earnest look into and address for themselves, so it's probably top of mind when others post issues they encountered. 1 is just true of a lot of internet posts regardless of if they're AI related or not. I think we can all agree that the AI response is stupid and probably not the intention of people who put guardrails on it. Now that AI is a thing whether we like it or not, I think encouraging guardrails makes sense. They will start out and will probably always be imperfect, but I'd rather they be overly strict. There will be limits and people are still learning to adjust them.

I know I'm just feeding into the trope, but your comment boils down to "when I critique something I get reasonable responses addressing the critique."

Let's keep racist/cultural attacks out of this. Unless you have evidence that someone tried to get her into an arranged marriage, it's pretty harmful to look at someone with Indian heritage and have arranged marriages pop into your mind. I've not heard any reference to that and it makes it seem like that was her only alternative. My understanding is that she was not pushed to marry him because she had no options. She made the decision to of her own free will and that's important.

Thank you! Her parents were college professors who seemed to support liberal ideals and she lived comfortably and is well educated. She did not need to marry this man. She is not some abused woman. He openly describes how growing up in a conservative evangelical house shaped him as person. He did not spring his beliefs on her.

Thank you for the link! Will edit my comment to reflect it's not new. It seems there's some question as to its journalistic merit with the wiki stating "The New York Times has described the site as "a blog that chronicles the gossipy media world"", but it seems it's been around for a bit at least.

I've never heard of the site Mediaite before. I didn't click the link, but plenty of AI slop sites are popping up and headlines like this are a good way to spot them.

EDIT: apparently the sites been around for a bit, and this seems to be a one off headline issue. The credited writer appears to have several articles without issues apparent at first glance. Another article says "White House attorney" but it's an attorney that's acting as a liaison. Maybe just a nitpick. Some sensationalist headlines. Same as I've seen elsewhere so nothing too egregious.

Is "prone to collecting myths" a turn of phrase? I've never heard it before, but it goes hard imho. Makes me wanna build a ttrpg encounter around it.

She clerked for Brett kavanaugh. You don't have to be a judge of people to know where people are politically and make decisions based on that. She knows what she's doing and we don't need any more fascism apologists. She is married to and supports a Christian Nationalist who's supporting fascism. He was raised "conservative evangelical", so I don't think this is a recent change in his beliefs. They both suck.