Made up, and then confirmed with experimentation against actual reality.
Let's not pretend science is literature with extra steps. It's a process whos aim is to confirm things in a way that removes all possible alternative explanation or influence. A good experiment completely and fully removes the human element.
No, there actually are explanations for the effects as they exist in mathematical models. The problem is we do not yet have one single model that matches both quantum effects like superposition and cosmic scale effects like gravity and dark matter/energy.
There is almost certainly some truth in those mathematical explanations, simply because it's unlikely that something that is 99.99% provably correct has no truth associated with it.
The problem is, it needs to be 100%, with proven and confirmed experiments, not 99.99% correct, before scientists will call it a "solved" problem.
Also the anthropic principle does not prove or disprove multiverses.
This is wholly inaccurate. We do know what causes gravity; time dilation near matter (at least for smaller objects like the Earth). What we don't know is why gravity, because we have yet to produce a model that matches both quantum effects and cosmic behaviors like gravity and dark matter/energy.
"Quantum gravity" is the general term for what solution would describe something that ties these two universes of behavior together. The process of decoherence isn't terribly well understood as far as carrying effects clear from particle scale to cosmic scale.
Even then, some of the mathematical explanations from current models are plausible, but unproven.
The original intent of patents was almost exactly that. You're protected for a handful of years, after that anyone can just use the patent as instructions for recreating it.
... then Disney and other fucking greedy ghouls of corporations got involved and greased the right palms...
Not really. The case should be grounded, so even if it were causing a charge differential in the metal, it'd just make a current to ground (or back to the neutral magnetron pole if it's not grounded). Although 'current back to ground' is likely misstating it, since it'd be an AC induced current that wouldn't be moving too far and ultimately just heat up the metal in place without electrons doing much more than wobbling about.
Metal in the microwave can create arcs because the metal is surrounded by the microwaves with no conductive path anywhere, so charges can just slosh around more and more as power is applied. Get a large enough charge built up in some area that it has the potential to jump through the air to a less charged place, and bam, arc.
It's like the difference between pushing someone on a swing that cannot go somewhere else vs pushing someone sitting on a skateboard (or an insanely tall swing on the ungrounded case). Only one of those cases makes it easy to build up more and more swing.
The door works fine because the holes are too small to even let the waves through, so there isn't a big fluctuating EM field all around it to produce much of any different charge potentials to cause current to flow, so no sloshing charges and no real heating.
EM fields concentrate from the edges, like how magnetic field lines concentrate around a paperclip hanging from a magnet. It's not about charged particles being able to retreat, but that the EM field will straight up be stronger in those areas.
Nah, even weak magnets bunch up really easy, at least to make a solid sheet with noticable crystaline-like deformities being the only exception to a contiguous layout.
Those balls are sitting way too loosely with way too many random gaps to even possibly be magnetized.
Other way around: the wants of the few [rich assholes] outweighs the needs of the many, because humans are dumb selfish animals that worship capitalism.
It was obvious hyperbole to point at how you are still hilariously wrong. Congratulations on being too stupid to understand how speech works. No wonder you let your kids engage with addictive games... You're too simple to understand how it's still bad.
Because they all come with microtransaction stores, including several of the ones you're specifically lauding, ya numpty.
Just because YOU haven't wasted money on microtransactions does not magically make them unsuccessful in getting many children to blow loads of their parents' money.
There are over 700,000 games on the play store. ... and 699,900 of them are basic, traditional mobile games that are basically a gamified e-store for imaginary goods...
Made up, and then confirmed with experimentation against actual reality.
Let's not pretend science is literature with extra steps. It's a process whos aim is to confirm things in a way that removes all possible alternative explanation or influence. A good experiment completely and fully removes the human element.