MothmanDelorian @ MothmanDelorian @lemmy.world

Posts

2

Comments

1,005

Joined

7 mo. ago

The same Ellison who suggested surveillance will be used to make people behave?

16And the second beast required all people small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their forehead, 17 so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark— the name of the beast or the number of its name. 18Here is a call for wisdom: Let the one who has insight calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man, and that number is 666.…

Revelation 13:16-18

It's somewhat interesting to see how they align though

It makes it harder to pursue science when you cannot use the terns others in ypur field use.

But like pre-nation of Italy Italian it can have fairly different interpretations based on regionality

No, he does as not all sources are valid. I for one would argue a game designer and writer aren’t going to be sources I would rely upon to define matters related to elections. There are better sources that are reliable and valid this game is not one.

Goat Simulator IV: New Vegas?

So you think you're psychic and you're wrong? I notice you aren't making any claims to any credentials either.

You have no idea about my background with anything. I would not share that information with strangers on the internet nor would I trust anyone who made claims on it.

Go look back at the first paragraph of your last post and tell me you didnt repeat the same argument.

Again no mention of the fact that he exposed intelligence to foreign sources and that violating US espionage laws is in fact directly relevant to her position.

The Director of National Intelligence isn't going to be doing anything in regard to individual rights. It's a cabinet position. They are an executive.

In general I agree she is a bad choice for many reasons but I also feel that this specific job shouldn't support people who did what Snowden did. Aside from DNI and maybe some military roles I wouldn't take issue with people supporting Snowden.

You are trying to argue that the individual duty of the director of national intelligence is to protect the constitutional rights of citizens because of the oath of office? Go look at the job description and tell me what they have to do with that.

The DNI's opinion on people who have violated US espionage laws IS relevant to her job. In fact it's a really important part of her job that she NOT support people working against the USA which Snowden did.

To be crystal clear here are you aware that Snowden wasn't talking about many things we didn't already know about in regards to surveillance? The article below was published 4 years before Snowden leaked anything. There are many other examples of stories like this.

https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=3535528&page=1

They cannot hope to gain the support of voters unless they make it clear they are interested in their voters.

They would rather gather the money needed to be able to effectively campaign than pursue policies designed to reign in campaigns costing so much. Wouldn't it be nice if we legally defined our election season to the formerly traditional end of February to November of the year of your offices' election?

That’s not the job of the DNI.

You made a really weak argument utilizing the oath of office. Do you really think you are in a position to speak down to anyone after demonstrating such a flawed understanding of our system?

Go look what the DNI’s job is and tell me what she has to do with protecting constitutional rights.

The oath of office is cute but try looking at the job description of the office we are talking about as that’s actually relevant.

That guy in corporate is creepy as fuck. I think he’s a pedophile. He’s always saying “TIME TO GET BUSY MINORS!”

Ge leaked them to many nations not just the USA. You know that other nations can access US press and the internet in general, right? That’s the enemies Im talking about eg DPRK, Russia, or Iran.

Why would you think that’s their job? Do you have any idea how any of this works?

Snowden compromised the security of the intelligence apparatus of the USA and regardless of the reason you can’t have a DNI that approves of this.

Musk is unelected why should he have access to anything?

I never met her. I have met Joe a few dozen times campaigning for candidates and gay marriage in MA decades ago.