Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
3
Comments
734
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Digital Restrictions Management

    Isn't it "digital rights management"?

  • One hell of a reach there. Anything to actually show it's an intentional message and not just reading between lines that don't exist on your part?

  • Just because you want to change the topic of discussion to a strawman it doesn't mean it's what we are discussing.

    Besides, you're the only one kidding around here, making up bogus accusations to discredit criticism

  • And also low quality writing and minimal satisfying entertainment.

  • Why is it idiotic to not like media that prioritizes pushing a message over being entertaining?

  • The fact that they arrived at this by purely legal logic is surprising to me.

    Assuming Canadian court systems work more or less like those in the US, it makes sense. Courts of appeal aren't there to rule on matters of fact. That was already done by the initial trial court (or should have been, at least). The appeals court, in this case, was looking at the legal question of whether or not it was reasonable for the lower court to deny default judgement against the people who never showed up to court.

  • And it doesn't raise red flags that someone was pissy enough over bad reviews to go and publish an entire article to cry that everyone leaving bad reviews is just racist?

  • What's wrong with complaining that a show puts talking points (or however you'd like to refer to the concept) over quality?

  • I mean yeah, user reviews aren't perfect, but this mess of a show doesn't prove it any more than literally every other piece of media people leave reviews for.

  • Lmao what? User reviews are useless because people leave their opinion on the show?