MirthfulAlembic @ MirthfulAlembic @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

272

Joined

2 yr. ago

I'm sure it varies a bit by region, but that wouldn't be a crazy price for the NE. HVAC is just expensive these days.

I'd recommend getting at least three quotes. If different companies propose different setups (e.g., all heads vs ducted vs mixed), try to get at least two quotes for each. I ended up getting six quotes due to how much they varied in both price and design. My highest and lowest quotes were more than 20k apart for a <1500 sqft space.

If you have access to a 0% financing program, don't wait too long. Those run out quick because it's such an amazing deal.

It's not absolute, yes. But we're not talking about any situation—specifically white and black children using a specific racial slur. One of those belongs to a group that has been (and still is) systematically persecuted with that term connected. The other has not. We're not seriously going to say that one white kid potentially being bullied is somehow comparable to the history of societal persecution against black people I hope.

The point I was making is it's not reasonable to turn one situation of someone being bullied as evidence that black people are not allowed to use the n word if white people can't. That's it. I'm really amazed that is somehow controversial.

How is it taunting if she doesn't want to say it back? The entirety of her response could be, "Yep." It wouldn't be taunting for someone to tell me, "You can't do nuclear physics." I would agree with them and be slightly confused why they were apparently out of the blue stating it.

If she's truly being randomly bullied, that's not going to be solved by telling black people they can't use that word. A bully would just say something else. This is a rather easy one to deflect.

Because it's not your place to tell people from a marginalized group how they are allowed to interact with the slurs that have been used against them. Reclaiming words and for once holding the power around the word is their right if they so choose.

It's your job as a parent to explain the historical and social context to your children. You have work to do if your child is bothered they can't call other kids a slur that those children have reclaimed. It does nobody any good to bury our heads in the sand, say persecuted people can't say it if my privileged child can't say it, and pretend there's no complex history there.

I feel like a conspiracy nutjob, but I can't see another reason for it sometimes.

The last bus in my city is about 10-20 minutes before most theater shows end in our downtown. So I can take the bus to go see a show, but I can't take one back unless I rudely leave during the final scene. Same deal for things like bar trivia. It's like they want people to drive drunk.

And I can't feasibly walk home because there's two goddamn highways bisecting the city that make getting from downtown to my neighborhood take five times as long to walk as it should.

Your bonus point is depressingly significant. The number of people I've heard say something like, "I don't like x, y, z about Trump, but I like that he speaks his mind and tells it like it is in his opinion" drives me crazy. When did it become admirable to be an unfiltered boor?

You've got me there!

According to Pantone 19-0912 it is. You were just very savvy to printing industry standards as a child.

Do we have the technology to do that considering the increasing heat, gravity, and magnetic force as one goes deeper? I feel like anything we could do would involve lots of nukes that would basically destroy the planet in the process.

It reminds me vaguely of Operation Trojan Shield, except with explosions.

It could be a binary file, though that would probably make it smaller if anything.

I'm guessing the point was the developer didn't invent some proprietary log that also contained a dump and other things that could conceivably be very large. That would also be terrible design, but managing to create hundreds of gigs of text in a game crash log is a special kind of terrible.

Most states have laws restricting faithless electors in some way, including voiding such votes (which has happened). Though, some lack enforcement mechanisms. The Supreme Court has upheld penalties for faithless electors within the past five years. As a result, it's vanishingly rare.

It's still a dumb system that is unrepresentative and relies too much on people just doing the right thing, but this characterization isn't totally accurate.

The people in charge of the program are getting fired, and an outside consulting firm is being hired to investigate. So, I imagine there will be a follow up later on with more details on that front.

It doesn't inspire confidence that there wasn't the oversight to prevent this however. These are human remains, not widgets.

I was thinking the same thing. This seems like investigative journalism that's more public and without the ethics and rigor part.

They are very much as a whole not negligible. They can be--people can get checks for cents sometimes. But they wouldn't go on strike and sign a deal if it never amounted to anything. I'm not even in the industry and have a passing familiarity with the concept; I've just been reading about it and listening to people from it for years.

DGA also has residuals in their contract. IATSE might for some roles, but you can't feasibly give everyone involved in a production residuals. The point of residuals is to hold over people in roles that are very fickle and can go years between jobs, like everyday working actors and writers. If you're going years between jobs getting hired for craft services, your food might just suck.

It would be great if everyone could get a share, but that's not realistic. Big productions can have thousands of people who work on them. Having to send the carpenter on a film a check for two cents yearly would create insane administrative overhead. There has to be a line somewhere.

I know. This is one of my major pet peeves, that even major publications seem to skip copy editing. I'll forgive it in an independent journalist's substack, but not much more.

While they are still insufficient, residuals do exist. It's why SAG and WGA went on strike last year, since streaming residuals were (and to a degree still are) garbage. It's not as directly tied to sales as if they received points, but with Hollywood accounting that's a risk. Though if you're talking about Nebula, maybe this is more about YouTube creators which is a different can of worms.

It really depends. One tenant could have an ant problem because another adjacent tenant is attracting them, which the landlord needs to address. If the structure has decaying wood, that can attract carpenter ants which is a landlord issue. Some ants like humid environments, so a poorly ventilated structure (like one with mold) could be the cause--also the landlord's problem.

Matt Walsh read this comment and is crying and throwing up as a result.

Judging by how many numerical fields on mobile websites still give me the full keyboard, maybe not.