I honestly can't tell if it's just a collective expiration date for a culture of wealthy incompetence, or if someone's been manipulating powerful idiots, but it almost feels like there's a coordinated effort to stir an abandonment of corporate platforms.
Honestly, I have hope that this is how the world gets better. All these companies who've been making a mess of everything on reputations they've long outlived have gotten too comfortable and too bold. A few Ubisofts and Twitters will be good practice for the bigger ones.
Maybe we'll even figure out that money only tells us where we go if we let it.
Actually, he looks like a John Travolta impersonator fucked a Street Shark, then fed their child on a diet of lemons and romantic stories about 1920s snake oil salesmen.
YouTube is getting a lot worse too, though. It's packed full of gimmicky content creators at this point who just make basically the same video over and over and over again. Sometimes their one point has some value worth considering, but even then much of the time they reduce themselves to a fake brand pandering to some small subsection of users.
Depends on whose grandma. My own nice sweet grandma returned to life for some reason? Sure! Somebody's deranged racist grandma who used to bring casseroles to the local neofascist meeting? No thanks!
Okay, so as a cab driver I have a lot of opportunities to get frustrated with how selfish and myopic people are. But you know what happens when I do that? I make myself miserable.
I, personally, find that my mental state is much, much better the more I'm willing to accept people not doing things 'the right way'. Yes, I could get annoyed for the hypothetical people who might encounter an obstacle to their mobility here (who have not and may not ever arrive), but what will that actually do for me or for anyone else?
Unless I'm actually moving the obstacle my disapproval is completely useless. It may even cause me to do something stupid and inconsiderate myself as I become distracted by my annoyance.
But if I just let it go, smile, and move on, the utter insignificance of the action can just fade into the background and not make itself part of my focus on how to reflect on humanity or my day.
Bunch of goofy wordplay passed off as tech news. But while we're here, how are they gonna say it's technically Linux because it uses a Linux kernel but isn't really Linux because of the OS on top of it when Linux is literally just the kernel?
Ultimately I agree. Open source software is the only software that's sustainable and that benefits humanity in general more than it benefits some company somewhere. I choose open source software basically whenever I can. I hope that some day in the future that'll extend into operating systems for personal computing and game servers, but unfortunately that's not the case at the moment for my use cases.
What's it going to take to actually do something about these ultra-rich leeches literally destroying our planet and everything good on it to inflate a number in a bank somewhere? How do we actually build up the initiative to stop it?
All our other problems seem largely centered around our inability to appropriately respond to extreme greed. Not only in actually actively stopping it, but in even identifying it or being able to properly censure it in the first place. The moment you start talking about the rich being the cause of our problems, there's a section of society that starts tuning you out. I definitely feel like as things get worse people are starting to catch on, but even once we're there, where do we go?
If we actually get to the point of agreeing that excessive wealth is inherently misanthropic and should be a crime in and of itself, how do we make it a crime while so much power sits in the hands of those who'd be on the losing end of that decision?
I hope the WGA and SAG can spark a change in people's consciousness around labor. I'd honestly love to see a lot more interviews and independent podcasts coming from the picket lines. If there's anyone who can convince Americans to fight for the value of their labor, it's the people write and play the parts in the stories they love.
I think the issue is that while Linux is capable of a lot when you can take full advantage of it, each task requires way more knowledge or a good tutorial and no complications.
For me, I love working with Linux and have been doing it on and off for decades, but it doesn't tend to remain my daily because of the extra steps and limitations.
I think if I had a more full working knowledge of Linux and I knew Python or had a stronger grasp of other languages, I'd be a lot more able to fill those gaps. But without that, it there are all these barriers to productivity that aren't there otherwise. Instead of doing the thing I'm trying to do, i end up spending the night messing around with some depreciated program or struggling with a weird use case and it simply requires way more of my time to get there.
Considering that I have a lot more experience with Linux than the average person and still run into this regularly, I'd say it's a big barrier to wider adoption.
Honestly the solution is probably more on the end of getting together to make some of these issues less complicated than on the end of expecting everyone to become a well versed Linux enthusiast. With such a high learning curve, unless you're using it for something it's particularly good at doing easily, you kind of have to want to get into Linux for its own sake in order to learn enough to make it easier to use. And even then, it's a struggle sometimes.
Even beyond corporate media I see a lot of people having this mentality that the Fediverse has to become a behemoth to succeed. We don't need that, though. There's no profit motive, so it can actually just exist as itself. No incompetent board members making bad decisions, no selling out to make a buck, just a platform that people can actually use
Sure, but that doesn't mean that every single taxi needs to be the taxi that picks up dogs.
I feel like the general approach taken by society when it comes to air quality, from strangers to my own family, is that air quality doesn't really matter, and that no accommodations should ever be made to improve it.
Which is part of the reason I don't really leave the house unless I have to. We're both stuck at home, but the situations look a lot different, and in my case people almost never see the result.
The 'missing' gleeful spite is the greatest thing about the Fediverse. I suppose she could go follow some horrible instances if she really wants that, but the lack of introspection about craving that leaves the article a bit lacking.
To me the headline here is that even someone who recognizes how much of a fool Elon Musk is to the point that she's writing an article about it is taken in by this toxic need to find sources of disdain. It's poison, and we're frankly much better off leaving those who still want that out in the middle of it until they mature enough not to spread it to these new spaces.
The fact that someone who uses the Internet to scratch this itch finds the Fediverse lacking is a very good sign.
So as a taxi driver with asthma and horrific allergies, I've found dog owners are not typically terribly understanding when I tell them we're going to have another cab come pick them up. I've had several people insist that their animal is a service dog as if this somehow changes my own health condition.
I've often found that my own access to public spaces is limited by the use of service animals and straight up pets in public places. I don't even try to go to breweries anymore. I wouldn't bother trying to get on a plane. Even hotels are basically a no go for me unless i want to get sick more often than not.
I don't pretend to have a solution to this, but access to public spaces for animals and for some allergy sufferers is mutually exclusive. It makes it a lot more complicated than 'service animals should be everywhere' or 'allergy sufferers should have access to public spaces'. The two are kind of in conflict. It sucks.
Nobody pays any mind to air quality and it's made my life a whole lot more difficult than it needs to be.
Anyway, i feel for her, but i think the service animal stuff is way over simplified and people forget that other people with disabilities also pay a cost.
I feel like if piracy is making it available, it's not really not available.
Like, we're lamenting the loss of something that pirates have made absolutely certain we have great access to than any time in history. MASH fans in the 90s might have the DVDs, but they definitely didn't have a copy of AfterMASH or the RADAR pilot.
With sufficient stubbornness and knowing where to look you can find damn near any piece of media that you can recall.
Weird cartoon that ran for 6 episodes and was never syndicated? Guaranteed someone has it. HBO puppet special for kids that ran exactly once ever? Got it.
Piracy preserves what capitalism can't be bothered to.
Millie @ Millie @lemm.ee Posts 1Comments 130Joined 2 yr. ago
I honestly can't tell if it's just a collective expiration date for a culture of wealthy incompetence, or if someone's been manipulating powerful idiots, but it almost feels like there's a coordinated effort to stir an abandonment of corporate platforms.