Just to get it out there... I checked this out about a year ago. It's not completely open source. The project consists of many executables and "pre complied dependencies" that don't appear to share matching checksums which may indicate modifications of some sort. Looks like a great tool, but I'm extremely skeptical of what's going on under the hood.
Hopefully they do truly open source it and prove me wrong, I'd love to give it a try some day.
Rarely do I find software I need that's not in the repo, but when I do, I just dusky build it myself. Not at my machine now, but I think I only have one PPA that's not default added. In the other cases where I don't want to build the app, it tends to be in Flatpak too.
That being said, although Mint is technically based on Ubuntu, it really doesn't feel like it at all. I personally can't stand Ubuntu, but again all personal opinions. If Debian-based systems didn't work for you and an arch based distro did, then go with it. Everyone's needs are their own and that's why we have so many choices :D
I'm a Linux mint user for my main system and am no beginner. As others have said, it's friendly to both beginners and advanced users, it's good to see you've made that choice.
That being said, don't stop there. Whether it's in a virtual machine or some old laptop, also try one of the "from scratch" systems. I went with Gentoo and that is the root of where a ton of my Linux knowledge started. It's my favorite distro simply because it has that history for me. You'll find everyone has their own favorites for their own reasons, so be sure to explore and find the one that you enjoy and helps you learn.
This is what I use. The project is dead and had some bugs that kept it running on my system right away, but as it's open source, I was able to fix the code a little bit to success. Just wish it was a little friendlier on cpu or could be selective on which apps to run instead of recording nonstop regardless. I have it start up with Steam for now though.
Been using Gentoo on my server for over a decade now and probably won't ever leave the compiling front, especially with a 12-core/24-thread CPU making it go as quick as regular binary updates on my mint laptop... But that being said, in happy to see them considering to do this. It'll bring in some folks who are afraid of (or just dislike) compiling everything from source. I think the biggest packages that'd benefit from this are definitely the browsers and desktop environments.
My comment on arch is just related to the use of black arch for a regular desktop or laptop machine, not my server (no desktop environment for the server). Was mostly trying it to compare it with Kali, actually.
Black arch does come with xfce by default indeed, but resizing windows isn't available right away. At least it wasn't when I tried it a couple of years ago. It required changing a bunch of configurations manually for whatever reason.
Never tried regular Arch after trying Black Arch, so not sure if they're the same feel, but after realizing the work it would take just to be given the capability to resize windows in the UI instead of just coming with drag and resize out of the box, Black Arch was a huge no go for me... Which kept me from wanting to touch regular Arch, lol. That being said, I go nope to Ubuntu the most. Gentoo is my favorite and is what my server has been running for the past decade without any kind of issue, but for laptop and daily use, I use Mint. Been on that one for about a decade now too... Used to use Peppermint (that still a thing?) and Suse the most before those.
Is wireguard hosted on opnsense, or an internal device that the port is being forwarded to?
If it's on opnsense, be sure you route outgoing traffic on that port over the correct gateway, possibly even an extra rule to be sure the proper reply-to is set. Opnsense used to do the gateway routing configuration automatically, but once wg got added to the kernel, you're now required to manually specify the gateway in your rules for it to work properly.
Also, if you see zero packets, then as others mentioned, try a different mtu. Some service providers (mobile, and even hotels) try to block all VPN traffic altogether and they do this by measuring the mtu of the packets. A little tweaking might get it to work, although I'd expect this to have held true for the VPS too, honestly.
I don't use those two flags, but have several pis running docker with no issues. They've been running (almost) 24/7/365 going on maybe 2 years now with the same sd cards.
Looked at the home assistant docs (not sure why I didn't just do that first lol) and looks like it would be a cloud push integration (requires the external account) :( so continued waiting game for me unless there's a custom firmware someone has out there.
Does the Internet connected one require an account and specific company app or something? Or is this something I could block from Internet access and connect to Home Assistant so I can deal with it over VPN instead?
Even if it's removed from fdroid because they want to close source it, I assume my current installations of their apps would be unaffected - just become stale and obsolete over time since they won't get updates... But as they're offline anyway, not too concerned in the short term.
Hopefully the company respects the privacy amd care of the open source community and won't take that away from us, though. One way to find out.
I wish there were some descriptions per provider with the ratings. Mullvad gets constant tests by third party against their network and has proven many times they have a no log policy that's working, yet they got a 4 out of 5...
With only numbers and generic descriptions that don't quite match the truth, feels like this sheet is a little misleading. Also, I find it ironic that it's on Google sheets.
Mikelius @ Mikelius @lemmy.ml Posts 0Comments 118Joined 2 yr. ago
How did I not know websites did this. Here I was always trying to guess the urls a few times before giving up lol. Today I learned...
Thanks for the extension suggestion too!