MiddledAgedGuy @ MiddledAgedGuy @beehaw.org

Posts

1

Comments

248

Joined

2 yr. ago

I see what you're getting at. It's a matter of perspective, I guess.

If you presented someone with a list of features from two similar but different pieces of software, they wouldn't say software b is broken because it's featureset is different from software a, right? But I acknowledge it's not that straightforward. It's more like telling them software b is going to replace software a that you're currently using, get ready to say goodbye to some features.

I still don't consider wayland broken, but I understand argument that it is.

Beehaw is my home in the fediverse, and I'm happy here. I like that they try to maintain a positive community. But if Beehaw left the fediverse, I wouldn't come along. Which is a change from thinking I might last time I saw this topic come up.

If beehaw ends up in a silo I think it will just have too little to offer for me. And that's ok. This isn't about me, it's about creating a safe space for your disenfranchised users.

I hope Beehaw stays, but I understand if they don't.

Probably preaching to the choir in the largely tech savvy world that is the Threadiverse, but going to PSA nonetheless. If you're concerned about privacy, don't use anything associated with Google. Because IMO this is entirely unsurprising.

Wayland != X11

Not 100% feature compatible != broken.

My opinion and also a TL;DR: of the article.

Two facts:

1. I love people doing weird things with tech.
2. I absolutely hate this.

Commercial software: complete goals x, y, and z and get paid.

FOSS: Project of passion.

Short and black and white version: I'd rather use the software people are excited to make.

My take on what's realistic: Things are rarely so simple. Commercial software will often (not always) be easier to use. I feel like most users don't want to expend any more than minimal effort to effectively use their software (which I don't think is unreasonable). So in those cases and for those users, easier = better.

Also, highly specialized commercial software might be better than any FOSS options. For example, there's nothing in the FOSS world that can compete with the big players in commercial electronic medical records software.

So, while I love FOSS, and I find Capitalism problematic, sometimes commercial is better.

P.S: The response is more to the concept of the post. Your actual post is both well written and thought out and doesn't feel at all like "black and white" thinking.

Wings for Marie pt 1 and 2 by Tool. It's a 17 minute pair of tracks so there's no expectation of you, dear random reader, to slog through it, but it's very meaningful to me. It is haunting and beautiful though.

Part 1: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BNTo34xOwoM

Part 2: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qJq9y9xPKWs

I lost my mother unexpectedly and when I was rather young (mid 20's).

As a little relevant back history of the lead singer, he was at odds with his mother when she was alive but she passed of cancer. My take on the song is that this is an ode to her.

My mother was mentally ill and we never had a good relationship, but after that loss I spent a lot of time thinking about all that was strong and good in her. And I miss her still, despite everything. This song evokes those feelings and still brings me to tears to this day.

Edit: updated formatting a bit and the links. The parts 1 and 2 video I found worked fine via ddg but the direct link didn't seem to work, so changed to links to the individual songs.

I feel like the mom outlet not clutching her pearls was a missed opportunity. Still, hilarious 😂

I honestly thought the days of trackball were at an end. I haven't seen one in ages. I can't stand them personally but I'm glad they live on nonetheless! It's good to have choices.

I concede the point.

Debian, Fedora, or Arch installs, on the other hand, are basically the same in terms of size

This line was the seller. It made me think more specifically that a Debian install without a DE is going to be pretty comparable to a base Arch install. And I don't consider Debian minimalist

In that it's not a kernel with just a c library and busybox, sure. But for a Linux distro, I think the term applies.

Arch. Rolling release is too much maintenance and AUR can be a pain. I do like the minimalist approach though.

For those of a similar opinion and aren't familiar with it, check out Void. Also a minimalist rolling release, but aims for more stable packages so less updating. Decent package selection in their repos as well.

Apple definitely came out with the better messaging product first. But RCS has nearly all the same features as iMessage.

Maybe it's not drinking the kool-aid, Apple does make a good product. But since integrating RCS has no negative impact to them, and allows them to use those features with more people, why wouldn't they want it?

Maybe, generally speaking on the userbase. I'm personally not interested in promoting Android or Google. I begrudgingly use it, but I'm not a fan. I am interested in interoperability, which this gives us.

Edit: Redundant

They did. RCS. And it sounds like Apple will be adopting it due to regulatory pressure. But the idea of "Apple users will want to integrate with" has a flaw. A lot of their userbase happily drinks the Kool-aid and want their walled garden, even if it's not in their best interest.

I will import EU phones if it doesn't.

Obviously a global change would be better, and hopefully that's what happens but at the very least those of us that live in places with worse consumer protection have that opinion.

Edit: In thinking a minute about it, I'm thinking that this probably won't be necessary. I haven't looked but I imagine there are still androids with removable batteries on offer, and it's safe to assume there will be more after this, even if it's not all. Though I guess if you want a very specific phone with a removable battery, that's an option.

Ubuntu is a tough one. I don't like it. I don't like snaps, but more than that I don't like their direction in general.

But I have some respect for them too. I think they played a pretty significant role in Linux being as popular (relatively speaking) as it is, and I don't feel like they have any ill intent.

So I don't personally care for it but I'm glad it's around I guess is my point?

Oh I totally misread, Ubuntu was what you had in the VM.

If you open the Nvidia settings and it sees your GPU(s), then it should be working, if you hadn't already come to that conclusion.

Fedora is a solid choice!

The YouTube adblocker battle is going to be a constantly moving target, so take this with a grain of salt as who knows when it'll break.

I use Firefox with ublock origin and watch directly on YouTube. I don't sign in, and I track the content I follow via rss. No ads, no nags, no issues.

Piped and similar as well as yt-dlp are also great and are better options for giving YouTube the middle finger, which I fully endorse. Just giving another option.

My guess is you have an nvidia card and are using the nouveau (open source) module instead of the nvidia (proprietary) one.

Assuming that's correct, here's Ubuntu's documentation on that. https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/nvidia-drivers-installation

I don't agree with your exact reasoning on the middle ground, but I think there's truth in the underlying sentiment.

I do think that users that are are competent with technology but unfamiliar with Linux are pretty likely to get frustrated with it. I had this discussion with a friend just yesterday. They want to try out Linux because of frustration with Windows 11's restrictive hardware requirements. But they also want to ease in to it. I think that's wise. In this specific case, I think if they tried to dump Windows in it's entirety and try to use Arch right off the bat, they'd get frustrated and give up. But if they tried a user friendly distro on a secondary piece of hardware? I think that has a good chance of creating a new Linux user.

I guess the point of that rambling paragraph is that that type of a user is a challenge, but there is middle ground to be had.