Is there a term similar to "shrinkflation" when food is made cheaper instead of smaller?
MeowZedong @ MeowZedong @lemmygrad.ml Posts 0Comments 492Joined 2 yr. ago
MeowZedong @ MeowZedong @lemmygrad.ml
Posts
0
Comments
492
Joined
2 yr. ago
And once they become professors, they forget how to keep their Eve Online alerts from interrupting class.
Australians.
Southern Australians.
I bet you listen to podcasts.
Fuuuuck, they cover the walls of our science buildings with those now. It's like, how much are you spending on this shit, but you can't fix the fucking HVAC in the building?
No u
Looks to me like she's done with his shit and about to use the nerve pinch to stop him.
This argument is hilarious with the intended implication that Republicans would somehow be different
Irrelevant hypothetical. The Democrats are complicit in an ongoing genocide.
Dems are still far better for the US though
Keep dreaming. They've been telling you this for decades, but there's functionally no difference at home (besides the crackdown on protests against the genocide, fascism much?). Roe v Wade was overturned under Democrats despite them using the abuser logic, "if you don't vote for us, our opponents will take away this right." Speaking of, the Democrats have had multiple opportunities to codify RvW over the last 50 years, times when they had super majorities, but they didn't. The Democrats decided to hold it over our heads as a threat instead. The Democrats decided to allow the Republicans to bully them into filling SCOTUS with right-wingers who would support their agenda. The Democrats have fulfilled none of their domestic policy promises to the people (only wealthy "investors," let's be honest, they aren't contributing to campaigns, they are investing in the ability to shape policy), they have taken no actions to address the frequent abuses of the filibuster made by Republicans, and they've by far been the more deadly of these two parties when it comes to foreign policy (sanctions) and military operations.
How much longer are you going to continue eating their shit and pretending it's chocolate? Do you really think you are so helpless as to have no option but to vote for one of these two parties? Do you think the only political action you can take is donating, campaigning for one of two shitty parties, and voting? Oops, my favored political party is doing shit I don't want (contributing to a genocide), but I'm not going to do shit and will still vote for them despite that.
Quit your shit and just own it. I'd say it's hilarious, but it just isn't anymore. You want to vote for fascists, you are pressuring others to vote for fascists, and it's either because you fucking want fascists in power or you don't want to oppose these fascists. You are supporting a genocide and it's sickening.
Just shut the fuck up with the fascist apologia and classic liberal moral grandstanding. No one buys the lie that the Democrats are the morally superior party anymore. The Democrats aren't progressive and never will be. Your support of them reflects on you and your values. You aren't progressive, you support these fucking ghouls despite claiming to have morals and values and desires that are opposite of the actions your chosen party is taking.
Get fucked.
Any chance you'd be willing to provide answers to any of my questions based on what you saw?
Good points. It's difficult to find a clear answer to how important lend-lease was to the Soviet war effort. During the war, the USSR and US obviously had good things to say about the program, but the start of the Cold War soured this discussion, leading to the US overstating and the USSR understating the impact. Here's an excerpt from a paper by a British scholar exploring the topic. Emphasis is the author's:
It is neither possible nor fruitful to try and put a precise measure on the material value of allied aid to the Soviet war economy, if only because of the unavailability of many Soviet production data. Whatever the value of western aid, the Soviet war effort was measured in human life and suffering incomparable with material aid from outside. Further, the Soviet economy became much more of a war economy than other combatant nations. Nonetheless, it seems that the contribution made by deliveries from the USA and, to a lesser extent, Britain and Canada, played an important part at crucial times and in crucial areas. First, and above all, was a vital margin of food supplies, second was the provision of specialist or deficit products such as aluminium and copper, specialized tools, high quality steels. In this respect lend-lease supplies overcame bottlenecks. However, it must be stressed that the major impact came after the Soviet counterattack and the beginning of German retreat. Such aid directly and indirectly helped defeat the German forces, and was in such a way a substitute for a second front, but it did little to defend the USSR from the initial onslaught. Third, some of the raw materials and more especially machinery and transport equipment was of positive value to the Soviet economy after the war. For this, the tyre plant is the best but not the only example.
It is nonsense to repeat the figure of four per cent of Soviet wartime production and disingenuous to disparage western aid - a feature evident in Soviet literature and one criticized even by Khrushchev. It is nonetheless true (and this is a point repeated in some Soviet works) that Britain and the Empire received far more than the USSR from the United States. Lend-lease, in this respect, may be seen as a temporary substitute for foreign trade. Britain was a major trading nation, highly dependent on imports, especially for food and raw materials. The USSR, on the other hand, was an economy with little trade dependence whose foreign trade turnover had fallen steadily during the 1930s...
The part left off at the end compares repayment of aid sent to the British vs the Soviets. A fairly short read that will give some more context to the conclusions I shared above.
One of the main points the author makes is that lend-lease was used by the US as a stand-in for entering the war and opening a new front in 1942 as the allies (and Stalin in particular) were requesting. In this context, lend-lease was a replacement for reopening the Western front in 1942, an action that could have been far more impactful. The US provided material aid in lieu of entering the war, shifting the human burden of the war onto the other Allied forces and particularly the USSR from 1942 to least at 1944 (note that lend-lease aid extended wider and was provided from 1941-1945).
Overall, the impression I've gotten from sifting through academic writings on the subject is that while lend-lease certainly helped take some of the pressure off of the USSR (mainly in the form of producing food, trucks, and raw materials), it's most likely that the result would have been the same. That said, wondering over historical what-ifs, while fun, should really be constrained to recreational musing and shouldn't be taken seriously.
For sure, I just like posting stupid things on memes.
I think your lab needs to get you a giant magnifying glass with a light so your squinting days can continue. They're super nice for things that can't go under a microscope. So far I've been lucky myself, but many of my colleagues my age experience the same problem. Some day I would like to get a macro camera so I can just show them pictures.
I will, but this is an 8 hour series.
As our laboratory's butterfingers, I find that this happens everywhere, but also the rotovap and always at the worst possible times.
Some of my colleagues refuse to directly hand me sample vials now because they've seen me frantically attempt to save a sample I dropped by treating it like a hackey sack one too many times.
If your lab assistant needed the rotovap moved to a hood quickly, chances are it should have been in there to begin with.
I too use a microscope exclusively for distillation and drying.
Piss + THF
Not just the clean lines, but the smooth curves too. It's difficult to do something like this and not make it all bumpy and uneven. Definitely lots of skill and time involved.
An alternative that I like to use in the lab is squinting and holding the sample really close to my face. Perhaps they used my method if the bugs weren't big enough?
Full HD and in stereo!
There are people who always have super solid movements that don't leave a trail. Many of us have a variety of textures that smear as they exit.
I get that, but my experience has been that even greasy, sticky shits get properly washed off my bum so long as I use a decent bidet and know how to use it properly. I haven't found an instance where a bidet has been insufficient and I don't mean to belittle anyone, but there is a bit of a learning curve and perhaps it was a lack of experience or the lack of quality equipment?
Poops that would leave me wiping 20x and with a sore, bleeding asshole while wiping are not an issue with a wash. I guess someone's poop could be very different from mine, but I haven't run into such an issue after using one for years unless I just didn't wash properly.
A bidet removes the majority of it but never all, and wiping reveals what is left behind.
This can absolutely be true, but it's an indication of improper washing and the need for a repeat or a better bidet.
For real, the US committed a coup in Australia with Whitlam. They don't constrain the CIA to just poor countries.
"A different damned drink."
I agree with the term enshitification for this thing normally, but this is just a "bait and switch" at this point.