Melvin_Ferd @ Melvin_Ferd @lemmy.world

Posts

4

Comments

1,142

Joined

2 yr. ago

Why are you giving it data. It's a chat and language tool. It's not data based. You need something trained to work for that specific use. I think Wolfram Alpha has better tools for that.

I wouldn't trust it to calculate how many patio stones I need to build a project. But I trust it to tell me where a good source is on a topic or if a quote was said by who ever or if I need to remember something but I only have vague pieces like old timey historical witch burning related factoid about villagers who pulled people through a hole in the church wall or what was a the princess who was skeptic and sent her scientist to villages to try to calm superstitious panic .

Other uses are like digging around my computer and seeing what processes do what. How concepts work regarding the think I'm currently learning. So many excellent users. But I fucking wouldn't trust it to do any kind of calculation.

Red meat is a staple of right wing peoples identity since a lot of them are cattle farmers and merica. So a study like this, posted to Lemmy is just great.

😆 I can't believe how absolutely silly a lot of you sound with this.

LLM is a tool. It's output is dependent on the input. If that's the quality of answer you're getting, then it's a user error. I guarantee you that LLM answers for many problems are definitely adequate.

It's like if a carpenter said the cabinets turned out shit because his hammer only produces crap.

Also another person commented that seen the pattern you also see means we're psychotic.

All I'm trying to suggest is Lemmy is getting seriously manipulated by the media attitude towards LLMs and these comments I feel really highlight that.

Search AI in Lemmy and check out every article on it. It definitely is media spreading all the hate. And like this article is often some money yellow journalism

Whoa that's like how many colors there are

Are you guys sure. The media seems to be where a lot of LLM hate originates.

Ok what about tech journalists who produced articles with those misunderstandings. Surely they know better yet still produce articles like this. But also people who care enough about this topic to post these articles usually I assume know better yet still spread this crap

How often do tech journalist get things wrong?

What an idiot

Agree with that too. I just think I'm getting really frustrated with how much the trump party has won. I'm noticing things changing especially in left wing spaces vs right and I hope it doesn't continue

I guess it's just not adding anything. And when a post is filled with it then it devalues the whole place and it makes it harder to find people with something of substance. It also makes it more likely for people with something to say to avoid these places as it just becomes toxic and annoying to wade through "hey fuck that guy" comments. Who wants to read that over and over and over again on every post

So what?

I do it a lot with my comments because I'm older and my grammar is terrible but I feel like I have ideas I would like to share but struggle to make them sound clear or even concise.

My longer ranty grammatically poor comments are me. My clearer comments that get better engagement from people and understanding are my comments that I asked chatgpt to improve.

I don't see why this is a bad thing. It is a chat tool. I like tech. I'm all for anyone using a language tool to produce language based products. As long as it isn't doing the work and is being reviewed then I would question anyone who isn't using it.

Here I'll run this comment through AI again to show the improvement:

Destroy humanity destroy destroy destroy

I really don't know how to put in to words what is annoying about it other than it sucks. Like it's a terrible shitty lazy comment. It's cancer. I don't know. It just sucks

What the fuck is this comment

Never trust any AI post like this that doesn't share the prompt

Yes like there needs to be a serious investigation if they ever get back in power.

Oh shit it makes sense now why they cover their faces.

If they showed their face then there is a chance they could be held accountable later on. I mean I know that was the underlining thing but now that I'm thinking that there could be a future investigation to hold them accountable that there is possibly no fucking way. It's not like people on the street recording them illegally kidnapping people can be used since they're completely covered.

They need to stop doing this type of thing. Maybe it's time they show up with their own armed security and force their way in. I don't know. Something.

Democrat leaders showing up and getting arrested or sent away is not a good look. It's like instilling learned obedience. They need to actually do something instead of showing up knowing they're going to get punched in the face just so they can highlight how mean the Republicans are. If they are showing up to inspect then they need the legal knowledge and have the power to see it through.

The Republicans backed by legal minds at groups like heritage foundation are leveraging the law. Do these Democrats not have their own legal teams and groups researching how to get things done?

It's leaving me feeling like this is all theater

Exactly, ok keep doing what you're doing. It's working great.

Don't they lay this amount off every year?

Their workforce is upwards of 200,000. During COVID it was only 100,000. 2006 it was 60,000. But they lay off 9000 and it's because of AI?

Why is this AI and not just business as usual?

I've been saying for a bit that these AI headlines in Lemmy are similar to anti immigrant headlines in Republican social media groups. I feel like this is just more evidence of it. It's yellow journalism tactics

We're sheep baaa baaaa

We do what they tell us. Our lives are all about buying things they tell us we need.