Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)MF
Posts
6
Comments
1,226
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I mean, come on. Can you honestly say I’m wrong?

    Tomorrow, you're all going to wake up and do the exact same thing. Check the headlines. React leftily. Complain into the void for a minute. Then log into social media and start dodging, blocking every right-wing group pumping out daily content. Nonstop memes, anti-COVID hot takes, “lefty tears” nonsense, trans jokes, Joe Rogan clips, cancel culture rants, just a constant churn of engagement bait, and it works.

    You'll bounce between platforms, curating a safe feed. Facebook’s a mess, Reddit’s fucked, Lemmy’s a small last stand. You read this week’s posts of the moment while barely remembering the four that got quietly dropped last month. You gasp at what the right is getting away with again.

    But do nothing. No counter-content. No message discipline. You won't organize, and you won’t create. Meanwhile, the right is expanding their media machine building, posting, podcasting, meme-ing, shaping narratives for millions.

    Then it’s off to work, where your coworkers are proudly sharing the same memes you tried to scrub from your timeline this morning. And when it’s all said and done? You’ll go to bed, wake up, and do it again the next day.

    You guys can get snippy and down vote or come at me to try to win some dumb online argument. None of it changes that this will continue until you all get lucky again and the Republicans lose because they fuck something up. You'll win from no effort from any of you on the left. It'll be from the right being assholes and going too far.

  • Maybe I'm wrong but the way I explain it is until the ambiguity is removed by adding in extra information to make it more specific then all those answers are correct.

    "I saw her duck"

    Until the author gives me clarity then that sentence has multiple meanings. With math, it doesn't click for people that the equation is incomplete. In an English sentence, ambiguity makes more sense and the common sense approach would be to clarify what the meaning is

  • I fully believe we lost the Internet due to content creators. Once PewDiePie made that first million it was all over. That moment is the point in our timeline where we veered into a very dark timeline instead of the good one. The other point was the Hanging Chad

  • Leftist can't do shit. I can't even think of the last good meme any of them kept alive more than a few days. Everyone is passive. It's rare to see them create content or organize this stuff to make it happen. It's a great idea, don't get me wrong. But like fuck will any leftist engage in anything beyond showing up to police approved protests so they can arrest and charge their leadership. Even if you did do this, the leftist mods would ban you from sharing the content until you were regulated to some weird corner that resides within the already smaller corner of the internet. And then most would down vote you. Lefty's are too dumb to plan and action this type of thing.

    Bahaha Holy shit, I scrolled down to already see people saying that we shouldn't call him taco. I didn't have to get very far. Love it. Fucking useless

  • But why not ask it for a source if this is information that has some critical piece to it. It's right far more than it's wrong and works as a great tool to speed up learning. I'm really interested in people sharing what prompts they used and the wrong answers it produced.

  • Don't care, of all the problems in the world. You're all making shit up to be mad about. Everybody gave their stuff up with or without AI. People were always scraping data and allowing it to be locked awa. Information brokers are not new. They have always sold our data. Nothing has changed.

    I'm not bending over backwards to give a shit for people who have slept to the point that we arrived here with these issues, and now that we finally have something cool they're up in arms because they think their stupid Garfield knockoff comic is the core competent to making AI powerfully profitable. I'd all for removing every content creator from the Internet. Scrub the whole fucking thing. They're parasites

  • I regularly ask it these questions and have yet to have it too far off of what I'd find from people on any forum.

    Here is me asking it today

    A heart rate of 178 BPM (beats per minute) can be healthy depending on the context:

    ✅ Healthy in Certain Situations:

    If you're exercising intensely, such as during cardio workouts, running, or high-intensity interval training (HIIT), 178 BPM can be normal and expected, especially if:

    You're younger (e.g., teens or 20s)

    You're fit and accustomed to high heart rate workouts

    General formula for max heart rate:

    220 - your age = estimated maximum heart rate So for a 25-year-old: 220 - 25 = 195 BPM max 178 BPM would be about 91% of max, which is high, but acceptable during vigorous effort.


    ⚠️ Not Healthy at Rest:

    If your heart rate is 178 BPM while resting, sitting, or sleeping, that's too high and could be a sign of:

    Tachycardia (abnormally fast heart rate)

    Anxiety or panic attack

    Dehydration

    Fever

    Heart condition or arrhythmia

    Stimulant or drug effects (e.g., caffeine, medications)


    📌 Summary:

    Situation 178 BPM

    During intense exercise ✅ Normal At rest or light activity ❌ Needs medical attention

    If you're unsure or it feels abnormal, it's always safest to consult a doctor.