MaybeItWorks @ MaybeItWorks @sh.itjust.works

Posts

1

Comments

94

Joined

2 yr. ago

Yes, this is what gets me too. If they had sounded the sirens, people are taught to take a certain action. That action (get to higher ground) would have caused a different type of confusion. So I can understand that some government employees sat there discussing it and ruled it out because the action they needed people to take, was not going to happen with the siren. I really don’t know what they would have told me people to do. Everything was moving so fast that giving coordinated evacuation instructions would have been damn near impossible. I don’t think the warning systems really would have done much, when you think through it.

I’m not trying to be an asshole, but there’s no way she has the experience necessary for this and that hurts everyone. Tech is complicated and when you combine that with antitrust, a new comer is not going to do it.

Nepotism is not required for police union nonsense. He’s just the white guy in the situation, probably

AND they fired the cop who was shot because she apparently forgot to turn on her body cam before going in. The shooting cop experienced no professional repercussions, but the other two people involved did. It’s really special.

Same for me. My 13 pro max is at 90%

It’s pretty complex to put a former president in jail. The logistics, alone, are a nightmare. Never mind the upheaval that would cause with the right-wing. So it’s not just being cowardly.

Why do yo need to know this information?

I am, but I’m not the one asking ridiculous questions.

Are you high?

Ah, well then you start talking about the difference in the surrounding oceans, winds, humidity, etc. the significant change in longitude comes into play there.

You are a lot further north in JP, so in the summer months Japan is literally closer to the sun.

Plenty of incompetent people fail upwards due to other factors. These people are not self aware enough to see what you see.

Chinese too!

You must be a troll.

However, here’s a person who died this week due to an extreme raw food diet. You whackos usually can’t even take care of yourselves while doing this nonsense.

https://news.sky.com/story/vegan-influencer-zhanna-samsonova-dies-of-starvation-after-decade-of-only-eating-raw-fruit-and-vegetables-12932232

You’re suggesting eating raw meat in this thread. That’s insane and dangerous to one’s health. You need help if you think eating raw meat is better for you. If you want to do a raw food diet, you better go vegan. You’ll also struggle to get proper nutrition. If you want to entirely ignore the importance of cooking to the advancement of humans, go ahead. That just makes you ignorant. You’re not wise, you’re ignoring science and foundational human advancements.

This just proves something to me. Humans seem to naturally evolve backwards after a certain point. Thousands of years to solve food safety issues and you want to ignore all the science because we actually solved a lot of food safety issues. It is the same perspective as anti-vaxers who think the vaccines are more harmful than the disease because they have not seen the disease. Get out of here with that nonsense.

Did you see OP’s response? They’re fucking insane and advocating for raw food diets including raw meat.

It is posted for discussion, and I think it stands unless you have some specific issue with it

They presented an issue with it, it is misleading. It does not indicate what other avenues of cooking do to food as a fair comparison.

There are people who advocate for raw-only diets, microwaving aside (they also oppose other heating methods)

I’m pretty sure none of those raw-only diets tell you to eat raw meat. If they do, that’s stupid. There are also people who advocate that the world is flat, does that mean that they are correct?

It's not intended to be inevitable, as there are people who heat with other methods, and even people who consume raw meat (or fermented meat) without issues

These people put their health at risk by doing so. Again, there are people who do all sorts of things “without issues” until they develop issues. People drink urine “without issues.” Should we all be drinking piss? No, that’s stupid. It is a risk to one’s health to eat raw meat. That’s it. No debate with science about that.

I certainly disagree with the response here and the downvotes rather than a discussion of the issues but thank you for offering some counter-view argument

Not all view points merit deep discussion. Are you anti-vax too? I certainly disagree with your insanity proposing people eat raw meat. However, if you want to do that yourself, go ahead. I’ve learned sometimes people want to harm themselves and don’t listen to reason. It’s best to let them do that and hope they don’t spread their misinformation to harm others.

I don’t get why they weren’t monitoring the cheetahs before one died. Seems negligent AF to import an animal and then watch it die. They literally let one die before deciding to do anything. These cheetahs aren’t pure, wild animals if they are imported. WTF India, maybe treat people and animals with more respect. Instead they’re response is, “Oopsies, I guess it was too hot while we watched them die. ” Morons.

There’s no reasoning with you. You are interpreting my statements in the most black and white manner possible when they are explicitly meant to acknowledge nuance. Nothing I said precluded education. I have simply been saying that parental controls are insufficient. I still use them, they are a barrier, after all.

Let me give you an analogy along the lines of kids. I’m saying that the pullout method is insufficient. It’s flawed in many ways. Am I suggesting that you should forgo using any birth control because there are flaws with the pull out method? Fuck no. I’m sorry that you cannot see the nuance.

Why does using parental controls mean that you can't also educate your children about good practices on the internet?

It doesn’t? Literally everyone here is saying that you should do both. No one is saying that using parental controls is bad. They’re saying it is insufficient to solve the problem.

Why the assumption that anyone who does blindly trusts them and doesn't attempt any other form of education?

There was no assumption here. Most of the thread is saying you should be a present parent and do both. I think if you are blindly trusting tools, you’re going to have a bad time. Further, if you want to shift your story to be that you do both education and parental controls, cool. So far you’ve said that you prefer using parental controls than “arguing with your kids every 10 minutes.” Regardless, you can do whatever you want as a parent.

I don't understand this religious adherence to not using the tools that are available.

I don’t understand why you at all think that anyone is “religious” about not using parental controls. I’m actually wondering if you are reading the responses. Literally no one is saying “don’t use parental controls.” No one in this thread is suggesting what you are saying here. Again, they are suggesting that parental controls are insufficient and cannot make up for being a present parent. This is not hard to comprehend.