MasterOBee Master/King @ MasterObee @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

514

Joined

2 yr. ago

Which part? The fees?

To which parts?

You started out pretty well, seeing both sides of the issue, understanding why some may choose not to get the CP vaxx. But then you turned totalitarian real quick.

"It's not mandated. Only if they go to public school...which you pay for. So you pay for a school that you're mandated to send your children to unless you want them taken away and put into the foster care system where they will get sexually abused, and you have to inject them with whatever we say, or else you can't send them to school, which we will then take your kids away."

What bank do you have that charges $35 for a transfer?

I transfer between b of a and chase bank, both known for having decently high fees, without any of those fees.

The $35 amount I've only seen with overdrafting. Do you overdraft every single transfer?

Same with us. I don't know what these other folks are talking about. I transfer seemlessly between my accounts at different banks.

And what happens if your kid doesn't go to the government education institutes?

They take your kid away.

Literally it's forced to vaccinate your kids or they get taken away.

So once again, you see it as reasonable someone may not want to give their kids the chicken pox vaccine, but you're forcing it, at the threat of taking their children away?

You said both options are reasonable, but you're going to force people to make the decision that you support?

So maybe I’m just misinterpreting your idea of what “anti-racist”

You are. Anti-racism is the lifestyle of fighting 'racism' in every day life. However, the definition of 'racism' has changed in academia so it's not actually about treating races unequally, it's treating the right races unequally.

So, in your example, if that business owner isn't hiring minority races over white races, they are not anti-racist, therefore, they are racist.

Being otherwise neutral to an established system is perpetuating it

See you're doing it here. Someone can be neutral to race; not making any determinations based on race, but if you say the established system, which you can't define, is racist (once again, the 'updated' definition of racism which says only white people can be racist), you want to claim anybody that isn't donating to the right charity, or supporting your causes, is racist?

So essentially, you've made 'racism' entirely subjective based on policies that you yourself (or the left in general) determines.

Racism used to mean a very objective thing: if you treat people differently based on their race. Now it's entirely subjective at the whim of one political parties definition.

I disagree, if there's a negligable difference, why form people to get a shot from big pharma that's known to lie to the FDA, CDC and the public

The guy who paid 45 billion dollars to lift bans on several infamous wingnut trolls like Catturd and turned a bird logo into an X for clout doesn’t seem like a Democrat to me.

He's the opposite of how the former ownership ran twitter for the past 10 years. I didn't hear you bitching about it then.

And, having uniform/unbanning regardless of political affiliation is how I believe media should be. It shouldn't be bias.

Fox News, Sky News, Fake News, etc., the former of which is the largest media company in America. You’re not an underdog.

Fox news is the only right wing cable network. NBC, MSNBC, CNN ABC are all left

Well for example the right to get the medical care you need.

"Need" - define need? Is a sex change for a 13 year old a necessity? If a girl wants boob implants at age 13, that's not necessary.

The right to take a goddamn piss in a public toilet.

You forcing anybody into a specific restroom despite protests from the majority doesn't make you right. Women should use the women's restroom, guys should use the guys restroom. I have advocated for penis room vs vagina room, though.

The right to participate in society as you are

No, you want it as they 'identify.' Just because someone thinks they are something else, doesn't mean they are that thing. I used to be called 'doggy boy' because I liked digging holes. I wasn't literally a dog.

rather than a how some fascist demagogue has determined you should be.

Fascist demagogue = nature? I get you may have an issue with mother nature, but that's your fight, don't force everyone to abide by your unpopular view of the world.

Have you ever stepped foot in a university?

I went to college from 2012-2017, I witnessed it first hand.

Do you think random electives are being forced on every student or something?

Sociology was, which we had CRT curriculum.

edit: also “anti-racism” sounds like some white supremacist dog whistle

It's the lefts all encompassing buzz word, so the left can criticize people for not being racist.

If I say 'I'm not racist" they respond "well it doesn't matter if you're racist or not, if you aren't anti-racist you're perpetuating white supremacy."

How were the students not being treated as equals?

There is no country in this world where workers all get to negotiate their pay.

In the U.S. for the most part people are able to. Except in situations where the government forces a floor. So we're damn close, every individual can choose to work for X amount of pay or not. Once again, except in cases where the government forces a minimum.

You just said the CDC doesn't make policies based on actual science.

I'm not changing the subject, my argument has always been against CDC and FDA corruption/misinformation

Both options seem reasonable to me, although I would lean on vaccination still.

If both getting vaxxed or not getting vaxxed is reasonable, is that something we should require for nearly kids?

Capitlism is about the ability of selling your services to a willing party. It always has been, and always will.

If I want to stack boxes for $2 an hour, I have that right. If I want to stack boxes for $200 I have the right to make that right. Everyone has the ability to accept my offer, or deny it. Capitalism, baby.

CDC reacted to a bunch of know-nothings

So is the CDC trustworthy?

1977-1979 under jimmy carter 1993-1995 under bill clinton 2007-2011 under Obama

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_divisions_of_United_States_Congresses

You said specifically dozens, therefore there must have been dozens of democratic presidents who had a full democratic Congress.

Not necessarily, it could be 10 times over 2 years.

Regardless, I've listed at least 12 years that democrats had a president and majorities in senate and congress - yet, not once did they enshrine what you argue is a human right. Either they didn't think it's a human right, they didn't want to codify it, or it's just not high on their priority list. They've had plenty of opportunities, you only got the dems to blame.

Ice is under the DHS which is part of the 'fourth branch' of government. These bloated organizations actively fight against peoples civil rights and most of them should be dismantled and defunded. They're essentially able to get funding and make their own rules thanks to the Chevron Deference, luckily the SC is reviewing that court case and will hopefully overturn it.

This would cause legislators to actually legislate, and ensure that their policies are what any part of the executive branch is able to enforce, nothing more. Overturning the Chevron Deference is necessary for proper checks and balances between our branches of government

They say that prisoners have access to tap water, but the prisoners say that tap water is crap.

This could all be solved by, ya know, having potable tap water by fixing some of our shit infrastructure.

Our treatment of prisoners is a disgrace.