MareOfNights @ MareOfNights @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

9

Comments

83

Joined

2 yr. ago

Please no, don't subsidize anything Java-Script. It will only make it less efficient.

Eyo what.

49 Partners??

I think at this point its more F+ than a relationship. Which is cool, but where do you get the time to talk to all of them? Are they a full-time partner? Even then. This has to be bait. Ain't no way u talking to 49 partners on the regular. Is the whole neighborhood in on this? What is happening.

Yes the worst thing about the meat industry XD

Nah it's more like: If she didn't want people to jerk off thinking about her, she shouldn't have worn such provocative clothing.

I honestly don't think we should encourage uploading this many photos as private people, but that's something else.

You don't need consent to jerk off to someone's photos. You do need consent to tell them about it. Creating images is a bit riskier, but if you make sure no one ever sees them, there is no actual harm done.

Interesting (wrong) assumption there buddy.

But why would I care how people think of me? If it influences their actions, we gonna start to have problems, tho.

Oh no, hanging the pictures on your wall is fucked.

The difference is if someone else can reasonably find out. If I tell someone that I think about them/someone else while masturbating, that is sexual harassment. If I have pictures on my wall and guests could see them, that's sexual harassment.

If I just have an encrypted folder, not a problem.

It's like the difference between thinking someone is ugly and saying it.

Am I the only one who doesn't care about this?

Photoshop has existed for some time now, so creating fake nudes just became easier.

Also why would you care if someone jerks off to a photo you uploaded, regardless of potential nude edits. They can also just imagine you naked.

If you don't want people to jerk off to your photos, don't upload any. It happens with and without these apps.

But Instagram selling apps for it is kinda fucked, since it's very anti-porn, but then sells apps for it (to children).

As someone who likes sports, I agree.

I don't take any extra, but I appreciate what it does. (It could calm down on the hair, tho. Human body hair isn't even pretty like fur. Why is it still there?)

Or the Latin name for Artemis.

But where are they? I need to know... so I can avoid them...

I never looked into this, so I have some questions.

Isn't the overhead of a new function every time going to slow it down? Like I know that LLVM has special instructions for Haskell-functions to reduce overhead, but there is still more overhead than with a branch, right? And if you don't use Haskell, the overhead is pretty extensive, pushing all registers on the stack, calling new function, push buffer-overflow protection and eventual return and pop everything again. Plus all the other stuff (kinda language dependent).

I don't understand what advantage is here, except for stuff where recursive makes sense due to being more dynamic.

Can we stop pretending billionaires are like Scrooge McDuck?

They don't have money, they have assets. You can take those, but dafuq you wanna do with it? Let the state run the companies? Have you seen any state-ran stuff? Idk, if I want amazon state run.

But what if I'm attracted to androgyny? I feel like a lot if people are and I don't know a word for that.

For reference I'm talking about memes like: My taste in women: Picture of LeanBeefPatty My taste in men: Picture of F1nnster

I think finnster had some coming out video, so might not be accurate anymore. But I see similar memes a lot.

It probably is the same rationale as with clickbait. It at least gets a response XD

The messages from gay guys are pretty similar sometimes.

Is this a post from the bloatlord himself?

It's not that much landlords but homeowners. They want to keep their property-value, so they vote to block any rezoning. And since they're mostly boomers they vote a lot and show up to local hearings etc. Landlords just don't have that much political power.

I mean, if you had a bunch more hospitals, probably. But that requires a lot more doctors etc.

In a way it's already proving my point. By having cheaper in-network doctors the price goes down if you are able to choose.

The problem is, that healthcare is often an emergency thereby creating an inelastic market by removing that choice.

That doesn't mean that the American health care system isn't also super weird for other reasons tho.

Still cheaper than the million you saved by not buying in a city tho XD

I think in the US that's true, but most homeless people are in cities and all the vacancies in rural areas. The city vacancies are way too low.

I mean, they can only do that, because people are willing to pay that. Just increase the supply and prices should go down. If they artificially keep them high, government should step in.