Manifish_Destiny @ Manifish_Destiny @lemmy.world

Posts

32

Comments

666

Joined

2 yr. ago

I second this. Just dig a pit.

Huh.

If only there was supreme court legislation that fit what the majority of Americans have always wanted.

Turns out it wasn't mold, it was fungus, all previous mold squares are now occupied my myconid soldiers.

Idaho native here.

They operate through a nonprofit here in order to lobby for hate. It is an exceptionally huge problem. There's a dude not 40 minutes from the capitol city with a warrant for his arrest and a militia and the government is just letting him do what he wants.

I'm not missing any point. It should be clear to people who don't understand security that running a protocol on a different port doesn't mean shit for safety. "Because it doesn't get as much attention" wouldn't mean anything to any enterprise firewall the moment it's not an http header.

If you want to get really serious go to stigviewer.com and go dig through the security controls for the software you use.

Sure, just don't mistake port switching for actual security.

Running ssh on 443 doesn't do anything unfortunately. A proper port scan will still detect such a common protocol.

https, wireguard and mumble.

Just set up shodan monitoring, use burpsuite or owasp zap, and check your pcap files for accidental plaintext.

Also ssllabs has a nice website checker.

And get a NGFW

Least shocking thing about this. Someone needs to leave abbot on a freeway on-ramp.

tar -xvf /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.tar.gz