Skip Navigation

User banner
Posts
1
Comments
1,747
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • when selfhosters can just help each other storing parts of others backup.

    That's essentially what Storj, Sia, etc.. are for, they're decentralized storage systems where users can contribute storage to the network which automatically distributes data over all the 'hosters'.

  • As long as they leave the local backup option that sounds like a good idea to me.

  • The lack of account mobility is really a huge problem with the fediverse, you lose all your stuff if you move to another instance.

  • Fedora or maybe Bazzite if you're gaming or using an nvidia GPU I'd say.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Probably not by much, since CPUs have had hardware acceleration for AES encryption for a long time now.

    I always prefer software over hardware for encryption, RAID, etc.. Because it's portable and not tied to a specific piece of hardware.

  • The power draw will go up when a device is drawing power from it, but there will be base/idle draw of course as well.

  • LXCs are more an alternative to VMs if your use-case supports it.

    Docker is its own thing with pre-made application images.

    VMs barely use more resources than LXC, debian minimal probably needs another 50MB of RAM in a VM vs LXC and that's about the only difference. It matters at scale but for home use it really doesn't IMO.

    That said LXC has some benefits over a VM of being able to pass through mounts and parts of devices, those can be useful for Frigate where you want to use Intel Quicksync or OpenVINO and still share it with the host and other containers, because you can't do that on a VM unless you have a device you can dedicate to the VM only. You can also bind mount a directory on the host to a directory inside the container which is useful for sharing files between multiple containers.

  • Ok, I've been trying to understand what you mean and one-line snarky replies are not helping your case.

  • I did I must be missing something..

    Also what is "Accrescent spreading software"? I searched for it and it looks like it's just an app store like f-droid?

  • I like the concept. But something without any central admins is probably going to be full of all kinds of awful stuff, and I don't want to have to spend time strictly moderating my own feed, because if my client happens to cache anything illegal then I'm now potentially distributing that illegal content P2P which is a huge problem.

    The mention of cryptocurrency or blockchain also provokes quite a negative feeling, it's basically just a haven for scams and useless things, and any kind of integration with it I do not want to be involved with.

  • Why does including a text file have anything to do with control?

  • Yeah Exos are enterprise drives, so there's no point in making them quiet like they do with lower speed desktop stuff.

  • You can add your existing photos as an external library after starting from scratch with Immich, they'll show up just like before.

  • The thing with any of the available methods is someone can save the content easily on their end, so it's only self-destructing in terms of the server it's stored on.

  • Sponsorblock will strip out ad-reads.

  • I'm using a Linksys MX4300 I got from woot for like $20, seems pretty good.

  • Oh wow, the router allows Admin and SSH on the WAN port? That seems like a massive problem to start with.

    WAN should allow nothing except established.

  • Does it even have push to mute with a keybind? It feels like their voice/video chat is super feature bare lol

  • Not great. It's missing discord features like screen sharing and voice rooms (only sort of has them through a third party app, Jitsi, but that experience is... not great).

    It also has moderation issues, lacking tools needed to keep spam out and easily control it when it does get in.

    I recently deleted my account because there was a spam wave sending out room invites to anti-trans named rooms, and there's no way to mass ignore, you have to click on every invite, click 'ignore' and wait like 15-30 seconds for the server to process.

    Related to the above it has performance issues, a lot of UI actions wait for the server to respond, so just have a long delay to them making the user experience feel really crummy.

    There are also a bunch of different client apps all with their own features, one will support X but not support Y and the other way around for another app, and there's no guide on what app to use so that's confusing.

    Overall it feels like alpha or very early beta software, it works if you're willing to deal with a lot of headache.