When they can afford to get sued by content owners and feel like coming off with that kind of money and/or bump their heads, I would imagine. Unless it goes to dark web.
A long time ago, someone from a not free country wrote a white paper on why we should care about privacy, because written words can be edited to level false accusations (charges) with false evidence. This chills me to the bone.
it's not like he's wrong about most of what he said, but the days when seeing yourself on fire to call attention to what's going on is more than a blip on the radar are long gone.
I asked someone who said they are a psychiatrist in another thread last week why belief in any religion outside mainstream religions are classified as magical thinking while belief in mainstream religions is not. I don't really care what beliefs people entertain as long as they're not mentally or physically harming anyone, I just really want to know how DSM psychiatrists reconcile that.
When they can afford to get sued by content owners and feel like coming off with that kind of money and/or bump their heads, I would imagine. Unless it goes to dark web.