Skip Navigation

Posts
1
Comments
227
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I do traditional woodworking as part of a medieval reenactment group. I also like games with basebuiling elements. Valheim, Minecraft, Ark, Conan Exiles, etc.

  • That has to be one of the stupidest things I've ever seen

  • I'm Dutch. I put subtitles on everything, even if the show is in my native language.

  • I picked up Diablo 3 a while ago but didn't really play until now. Finished the campaign, jumped to adventure mode, got my 6 piece set and I'm now grinding for ancients. I just finished a greater rift lvl 100. It's fun so far but I should probably have started a seasonal character instead of a standard. But I'm too lazy to do it all again.

  • Yes, but those buyout prices aren't negotiated in a vacuum. When the number of entitlements goes up, studios will demand higher buyout prices. There's a reason free game quality has been lackluster lately. Studios demand a higher buyouts and Epic doesn't want to spend too much money, so they go with smaller titles.

  • They pay a fixed amount based on expected/average number of units given away. If that number is higher, devs can get more money.

  • Epic still has to pay the developers even if they give away the game for free. I'm happy to help bleed Epic dry by taking their free games. But I will never ever spend a single cent on their platform.

  • I think it's a really bad term. Orcs are born evil. They can't really help themselves. Russians are humans. They choose to be evil. That's worse IMHO

  • Ridge Racer was awesome and just so much better than the other racing games at the time. Especially when you put the camera just a few inch from the asphalt.

  • Anything that's steam deck certified should run flawlessly on Linux

  • RMS doesn't disagree with OSI about the open source definition. He just thinks his Free Software definition is better. But RMS would most certainly not call "source available" software "open source"

  • Because the OSI has been defining and stewarding open source for 25 years. It is the de facto definition and has been recognised as such by multiple governments around the world. Anyone trying to muddy the waters is probably trying to sell you their "source available" software as open source.

  • Most organisations and individuals that disagree with their definition are trying to sell you source available software as open source.

  • If it's not OSI approved then it's not open source. I hate it when companies try to dilute the open source moniker. This is "source available"

  • Maybe it's time to revisit it sometime then, thanks.

  • My wrists can't take any more flask spamming abuse.

  • I think that vulnerability was a non-issue. Someone could get to your password if they had full access to your machine to run arbitrairy code. But if someone has that much access, it's already game over.

    But yeah, Bitwarden is better IMHO

  • On the flip side, no dev worth their salt was going to trust Unity with him still as CEO.