Madison420 @ Madison420 @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

3,079

Joined

2 yr. ago

I gotcha, I probably could have handled it a bit better myself and yes it is a James Madison reference.

I think we have actual evidence that they do not intend to cede their power by not bright lining presidential immunity or being less vague. They may be horrific people but they are in fact quite the schemer and finagler. Chances are if the admin pushes it they'll just deputize willing participants which leaves us with either a civil war or rule of law.

Certainly a better attitude then why bother.

That's not an actual argument though and if anyone is playing expert it's you so maybe cut back that derision by like 50%.

No at this point it's so we'll known that Peter Navarro just lied and created fake experts to make his bullshit tariff theories seem more sane.

Unlikely. They don't want their power usurped.

Wrong. You cannot run again after two successful elections.

Will the schools want it to not happen, the police don't care if it happens they just care about bad or as always.

What exactly do you want them to refute? You offered opinion they rebutted with essentially "your argument is shitty and stupid" simple as.

Very sub and subject dependent honestly.

There's enough billionaires that without changing your taxes and mine much you could easily pay for ubi and honestly most perspective social benefit programs.

They want to control the media around the inevitable school shooting. The calls from inside while cops wait outside are not something the police or schools want to hear again.

It's specifically intended to resemble Hitlers mug shot.

Armed with $300 of temu armor and society era weapons. They're business monsters so maybe they should analyze that return on investment.

the court won't have proceeded with the case if they don't think the person named in the case has been served,

Fun fact, the case did not proceed they're specifically asking for it to.

so the fact that he didn't turn up to court means he must have been served otherwise they wouldn't have had the trial yet.

No, the date proceeds unless the court says otherwise even if it's simply to show up and say they don't have service yet.

Y'all really don't have any civil court experience do you?

Difficult, yes. Stupid, indeed. How the legal system works? Also true.

In Trump's words, "he doesn't have the cards" "he has bad cards". Which also makes it fairly clear he's never played poker or has and is baffled by the rules.

https://www.thinkdefence.co.uk/2023/05/fibre-optic-guided-missiles-efog-m-polyphem-and-others/

Depends on the missile but in this case we know they've said they got the idea from old tow missile reels because the folks who built them made mention of it.

A summons still has to be served in civil court meaning actually made aware generally by a hand to hand transfer. There is no mention of that happening and court dates proceed regardless of actual service unless the court moves out preemptively or the other party motions to move it forward to affect service.

So the question is do you know the difference between service and summons and the interplay between them.

No, their memory is fine. You're knees are just a bit more scuffed then theirs.

Not really, they're asking for default without actually serving the person and that just isn't how our justice system works.