Madison420 @ Madison420 @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

3,073

Joined

2 yr. ago

They're just not that useful they were a boogie man to hunt terrorists and later testimony came out that basically said it was all made up to hunt terrorists.

Hamas? No no, Israel detonated disguised pagers in civilian population centers to get "Hamas" people. Mostly in countries they aren't at West with either, fun isn't it?

Combatants and neutral ships that breach exclusion, again Israel isn't even claiming that's what happened so why are you?

I'm not because they haven't, there's a man made famine at the moment hence all the starving children.

USCG merchant definition:

The term "commercial vessel" is defined by the United States Coast Guard as any vessel (i.e. boat or ship) engaged in commercial trade or that carries passengers for hire.

It is not involved in trade nor available for hire. You should read once ever.

You just didn't read it.

Your own source says visit and search, not capture and take as a prize, you'll notice that's reserved for combatant ships not neutrals outside of the exclusion zone.

Similarly the source your source cites specifically and in multiple lays or that humanitarian aid is a different beast and indeed blocking aid makes a blockade illegal.

Dirty bombs really aren't the issue everyone wants them to be. If you have enough to make a meaningful dirty bomb it's more rational to refine it and make an actual nuke.

"claw back" steal, it's called stealing. And npr should take them to city under the ftca.

Just quote 1984 at them, none of them actually read it but goddamn do they love misquoting it.

Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.

Hey at least they didn't trigger remote detonated teddy bears or pencil sharpeners or wherever other benign everyday object they choose as a murder weapon this time.

Yes, though the way you are buried in Islam is extremely important. No, it's an impediment to admission, like an incredibly hateful speed bump.

Depends on whom and when. Cromwell for example was exhumed, dismembered and displayed specifically to spite him. But yes In the middle ages if you were basically being given extra steps to get to heaven.

That's most Abrahamic religions for reference a beheaded Christian can't go to heaven either.

That said the number one rule in Islamic burial is no cremation like... A bomb is incineration. It's not a total bar but if you believe in such things you'd be having conversations trying to justify why you are the way you are. Getting disassembled is probably a pretty good excuse but still.

It's worse when you know that in Islam a person who is not whole cannot just enter heaven so bombing and dismembering a person makes it harder for even a innocent pious person to get into heaven.

visit and search all merchant vessels

A. Where do you see detain, seize, kidnap and deportation from a state they never intended to enter? Nowhere? Because it isn't legal.

B. Yes Israel is the warship. No they're a humanitarian ship which is specifically allowed by international law so long as they agree to security measures like..... A visit and search. As an aside a merchant is involved in commerce ie. Trade. Humanitarians are the ideological antithesis of Marchants.

C. You seem to think they can exert a total blockade which is illegal, your own source cites the 2019 decision that the 2019 blockade was legal specifically because it did not bar aid.

They never entered an exclusion zone, Israel essentially said leave the region which is illegal.

Israel extends an empty gesture they have no intention of actually doing hence all the aid not coming in. Similarly even in a blockade aid is specifically allowed or the blockade is illegal, seizing an aid ship and deporting is crew is strong evidence it's an illegal blockade which is why they allowed all this to happen. It's gotta get to court somehow and doing this to white celebrities is bound to get more traction then some other group attempting the same.

Keywords warship and belligerent. They're neither a belligerent nor is it a warship.

A. Jurisdiction. B. You're confusing ras with PC , you need pc for arrest you need ras to detain.

Because they don't have to, they're well outside the blockade and Israel doesn't own the ocean.

No, international law says a ship entering a blockade illegally can be boarded and detained after they've been given a chance to leave the area.... If they have to be given a chance to leave you can't steal their property and kidnap their crew, that's a crime.

Read the law and don't double post the same thing to me please.

You do actually. They need pc for arrest, they need reasonable articulable suspicion to detain, your simply confusing or conflating the two. Similarly a police officer needs jurisdiction, Israel doesn't have jurisdiction outside of the blockade or territorial waters.

To run a blockade you actually need to enter it, at anchor in international water after declaring your intent is quite literally the textbook reaction to a blockade and specifically to enter one legally.

Israel also says it's ok to run over people with tanks so maybe Israel is full of shit and you should trust third parties over the most active belligerent. FYI Hitler tried to say invading Poland for security reasons was legal, turns out no but Israel decided to quite literally pull a Hitler.

Stop cucking for authoritarians bud.

That's twice now.

Good, see ya. Stop trolling or at the very least be more effective.

By definition no it's not violence and yes targeted continual contact against warning to cease is harassment.

Dictionaries and code books, read like one ever.

And then you double down, neat! I will advise you harassing me isn't the best choice but you do you.