Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)MA
Posts
1
Comments
434
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I am not defending her. I am not defending democrats. She never wanted to become president. It showed. She and her entire party bowed down and conceded without even a hint of willpower to fight. She was the only thing left standing against fascism, and she just gave them the keys of the kingdom.

    But she was right about what the current regime would do if it took power. Which the meme was about.

  • I wasn’t criticizing your comment. I never implied that you had voted for the other guy.

    And I have no worship for her. She’s a politician. I only had hope, for the country and for the world, that the other guy wouldn’t take power.

    She was pro fracking. Got to line those pockets afterall.

    A lot was implied in that comment the person wrote. Implying that she is corrupt.

    That isn’t criticism. That is badmouthing.

    And that is what I have a problem with. The double standard, and the gratuitous smearing. That’s what revolts me. That’s what upsets me.

  • No argument, no talking points, no facts, no sources, just a biased opinion in a salty comment.

    A lot was implied in that comment. Implying that she is corrupt. That wasn’t criticism. That was badmouthing.

    And that specific style of badmouthing usually insinuates justifying a non-vote, which in this case, meant a vote for the the other guy.

    She wasn’t absolutely perfect, and she wasn’t the absolute exact perfect fit for everyone. And yes, her campaign could have been run better. Nobody’s perfect. No one can please everyone. But hey, at least she didn’t wear a tan suit!

  • No argument, no talking points, no facts, no sources, just a biased opinion and a salty comment.

    That’s not criticism. That’s badmouthing.

    I’m tired of these people pointing at one candidate’s speck of dust, while ignoring the other candidate’s plank to justify not voting against a fascist dictator.

    She was pro fracking.

    Maybe she was. Maybe she wasn’t far left enough. And so, because of that one specific detail, that as enough to tip the balance and swing the vote for the guy who is not only very pro fracking, but also for destroying the entire ecosystem and environment scorched-earth style.

    I’m so f… tired of the double standard.

  • Also, they don’t seem to remember that Mac OS X 10.2 used Aqua and glassmorphism in 2002 to match their iMac’ brand new translucent style 5 years before Windows Vista was released (2007).

  • Because people don’t seem to remember that Mac OS X 10.2 used Aqua and glassmorphism in 2002 to match their iMac’ brand new translucent style 5 years before Windows Vista was released (2007).

  • Yes, it is. And I don’t give a f.

    I’m just tired of these people pointing at one candidate’s speck of dust, while ignoring the other candidate’s plank to justify not voting against a fascist dictator.

    She was pro fracking

    Maybe she was. Maybe she wasn’t far left enough. And so, because of that one specific detail, that as enough to tip the balance and swing the vote for the guy who is not only very pro fracking, but also for destroying the entire ecosystem and environment scorched-earth style?

    Oh, she showed she was just a little bit more right than center, she wasn’t left enough, so I’ll vote for the far-right fascist instead.

    Every time I read some comment like what the person above wrote, I get to remember that these voters are "just simple farmers. These are people of the land. The common clay of the new West. You know…"