Skip Navigation

Posts
279
Comments
2,343
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • As opposed to posting memes to elicit emotional responses?

  • Ah, good argument. I'm totally convinced now and will immediately change my opinion.

  • Because it's diversity for diversity's sake. It encourages people to maximize on their unchangeable attributes like skin color or sexual orientation instead of any actual skills.

  • And do you think the cops would remove me from your house before giving me a trial?

    Why don't I get to stay? I demand to stay at your house until this is sorted out.

  • Businesses aren't people.

    Where did I claim that?

    No, the market does not give a flying fuck about justice. That's why we have a government.

    Wrong. Government meddling is in fact the main reason why the market doesn't correct itself as fast as it could.

  • Yeah, no, that is exactly what was claimed.

    The assumption of rational actors is standard practice in economics, basically every single theorem depends on that. When I pointed out that racism isn't rational, the argument changed to "well, you can't assume that everyone is rational".

    Yes. I know. I have a fucking degree in this field. Believe it or not, people have figured out how to deal with that problem a long time ago. Look up the Efficient Market Paradox, and you'll see why rationality is still a sensible assumption to make.

  • Nobody chooses to be white either.

  • What was the evidence that convinced you?

  • If rationality is overrated and DEI is rational, isn’t this an argument to discard it? Conversely, if it isn’t, isn’t this an argument that DEI is irrational?

  • I’m sorry, but what part of what I said was antisemitic?

  • Mar A Lago seems like a nice place to get deported to. Thank you for your kindness, I’ll take it.

  • It's because the point of society isn't to root for bad businesses failing. It's to ensure the just treatment of all people.

    Isn't it justice for bad businesses to fail?

  • If DEI made companies more money it wouldn't have to be legislated, would it. Anyone with a smidge of business sense would absolutely crush it by hiring all the people that racists routinely overlook.

  • If racist businesses will fail on their own because racism is not sustainable, why does there need to be a law against it? Let them fail of their own accord. It might take a while, but if you're right, they most certainly will.

  • If I showed up at your house at night, unannounced and without permission, would you throw me out right away or wait until I raided your fridge?

  • Right, so if race is irrelevant, any company who's willing to hire race-blind would be able to easily outdo all of the racist ones by hiring the people others won't. What part about that are you not understanding?

  • Then why doesn't someone go and create a company to hire all of that untapped non-white talent, surely they'd be running circles around their competition...

  • Well, I certainly hope I'm not posting here in my sleep.

  • They already broke the law by coming here illegally.