MHLoppy @ MHLoppy @fedia.io

Currently studying CS and some other stuff. Best known for previously being

---

Read more

Posts

106

Comments

228

Joined

2 yr. ago

There's a pretty strong no-scraping (and scraping-adjacent) sentiment within Mastodon

Well, if you allow the logical sequence presented (whereby small and local authors are disproportionately supported by the bookstores in question), I think it's enough of a loss to be worth collectively considering how to prevent it. This is kinda like the physical books equivalent of losing indie game devs publishing their stuff on Itch.

Well, not to shit on the idea too much, but right now as of posting, looking at ~100 posts in the feed and the majority are bots, automated posts, or otherwise "brand" posts, not just regular people, and a few are Threads users or bridged Bluesky/Xitter accounts.

Doing a quick label:

• Human: https://503junk.house/@pettylarcen/113799872963899948
• Bot / Automated: https://flipboard.com/@thehindu/national-dkoomk3rz/-/a-Wrbuqb96QnuLzyLZOzNr5A%3Aa%3A2437248393-%2F0
• Brand: https://jforo.com/@pg/113799872842675573
• Brand: https://mastodon.social/@revistahamartia/113799873103967261
• Bot / Automated: https://beige.party/@weird_prompts/113799872991959203
• Bot / Automated: https://flipboard.com/@einvestidor/e-investidor-3hlliu9sz/-/a-qXSCrokETXuobrs7LeTyIA%3Aa%3A3418138642-%2F0
• Human: https://techhub.social/@davey_k/113799873017718358
• Human: https://social.vivaldi.net/@ladychelseaofthevoid/113799873046250477
• Human: https://mastodon.social/@zandra/113799873097548123
• Bot / Automated: https://flipboard.com/@einvestidor/e-investidor-3hlliu9sz/-/a-XeAr1Gw6Tzq_TloPwjtlfg%3Aa%3A3418138642-%2F0
• Bot / Automated: https://mastodon.social/@Kochi/113799873124639124
• Unknown Bridged Bluesky acount (it's private and not in English so it's harder to label): https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:crkrjt6p5j3jfvmyvtmgnflc/post/3lfddis6avk2u
• Bot / Automated: https://mastodon.social/@onthisday/113799873284418993
• Threads User: https://www.threads.net/@willianmax/post/DEnWuIvvG5n
• Bridged Bluesky User: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:dctqr7kcavgggjipg6s2xc56/post/3lfddip6ih22r
• Human: https://douchi.space/@albusdumbledore/113799873324955194
• Human: https://troet.cafe/@Verfassungklage/113799873394589676
• Human: https://inari.opencocon.org/@matoken/113799873421069677
• Bot / Automated: https://www.socialnews.xyz/2025/01/09/fadnavis-tells-officials-to-focus-on-completion-of-infra-projects-within-time-limits/
• Bridged Xitter User: https://x.com/QBsMVP/status/1877426082275553391?mx=2
• Bridged Xitter User: https://x.com/scottmerkin/status/1877426155701108895
• Bridged Xitter User: https://x.com/CodyStavenhagen/status/1877426072259580060
• Non-human Bridged Xitter User: https://x.com/TSN_Sports/status/1877426003338727654
• Human: https://mastodon.content.town/@operationpuppet/113799873136927423
• ???: https://masto.ink/@torontotv/113799873345457501
• Human: https://chaos.social/@chris_gammell/113799873391924201
• Bot / Automated: https://mastodon.social/@indie1023_playlist/113799873574333510
• Bridged Xitter User: https://x.com/DOrlandoAJC/status/1877425955049767055
• Non-human Bridged Bluesky User: https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:y2g5vymm2cvveec6cnspcvzo/post/3lfddivgl5f2j
• Bridged Xitter User: https://x.com/kfitz134/status/1877426109018468540
• Human: https://kafeneio.social/@norshgaath/113799873389635436
• Bot / Automated: https://jb.md/@news/113799873554864843
• Bot / Automated: https://hachyderm.io/@selfcare/113799873596733002
• ???: https://mastodon.social/@EndIsraeliApartheid/113799873638378451
• Bot / Automated: https://flipboard.com/@janettespeyer/glorious-islands-623snqlnz/-/a-6u8jQ1XER2iJNsaC0LHzqw%3Aa%3A76802984-%2F0
• Unlabeled Bot: https://mastodon.online/@MTBotProfound/113799873683782913
• Bot / Automated: https://flipboard.com/@ctvnews/atlantic-lgqhk918z/-/a-fZkbJZybQXGhrgdvRKcxpw%3Aa%3A2823982346-%2F0
• Brand: https://mastodon.social/@KashmirFight/113799873720744097
• Bot / Automated: https://bots.robots.rodeo/@orcspiration/113799873169974336
• Brand: https://mastodon.social/@luxuryelitefinds/113799873675082571
• Bridged Xitter User: https://x.com/NJDevils/status/1877426162068058396
• Threads User: https://www.threads.net/@ernestoacostame/post/DEnWuZduJoc
• Brand or Unlabeled Bot: https://mastodon.social/@Pahalikhabar/113799873753297734
• Human: https://mstdn.social/@Ttubretep/113799873669338700
• Human: https://fosstodon.org/@softlandinglinuxsystem/113799873694371626
• Human: https://dice.camp/@Covok/113799873844076786
• Bridged Bluesky User: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:vpkw7cvu6eu742hvjk5wsxf2/post/3lfddj225h22x
• Bridged Bluesky User: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:2yuhperkb7ob5hhwshar4c5b/post/3lfddj5sxq32m
• Bot / Automated: https://mastodon.scot/@railway_regret/113799873833612028

That's getting close to the 5k character limit, but you get the idea. This has actually negatively influenced my opinion on fediverse activity. I didn't realize that such a high share of the activity wasn't actually just "normal users".

Greed or dishonesty are other abstract ones to consider. Worried that removing dishonesty could cause some harms, but I guess anything in the thread probably could.

Real life incremental game!

Certainly not going to disagree that it's unhealthy, but it does probably have enough protein and fat to keep you satiated for a while.

Yeah I'm also confused about its current state / status in currently-released games. It looks like a significant enough of a feature that I would naively assume that if it was implemented in a currently-released game that the devs would boast about it, so I guess it's not there yet?

Different people also have different sensitivity to different types of artifacts. No doubt a degree of the complaints is overblown due to a big of tribal / mob mentality going on, but a few of the people complaining might just be more sensitive to it.

With TAA specifically there's probably also implementation differences going on, where someone has a bad experience with it once or twice and then generalizes that experience to all implementations of it.

Someone mentioned Neural Radiance Caching to me recently, which Nvidia's been working on for a while. They presented about it at an event in 2023 (disclaimer: account-gated and I haven't watched - but a 6-minute "teaser" is available: YouTube).

I don't really understand how it works after having skimmed through some stuff about it, but it sounds like it could be one of several ways to improve this specific problem?

Haha, opposite experience for me! I don't play it but know some people that do, and I only ever heard about them playing it on their PCs, so it was their comment that made me realize it was also available on phones :P

This is indeed way better!

To be honest I'm not sure if the metadata actually matters much or not (I've never had to ultra-optimize like this before), but I just ran it through a PNG size optimizer and let it figure it out haha.

Shit, you're absolutely right, I missed an (in hindsight very obvious) optimization - bit depth. It's been so long since I've actually needed to worry about it that I forgot that the setting existed! What makes it even worse is that I did already play with quantizing the colors dwon to a more limited space, I just never baked that in as the bit depth haha.

Might be talking within the context of PC gaming, where even a relative potato will beat the performance of a flagship phone.

Responding to Valmond's comment got me thinking about doing some more pre-processing to assist the compression, so here are three more 1KB versions which I think are slightly improved:

• 15% res (same as my original 1KB version) https://files.catbox.moe/f2gvdq.webp
• 15% res, (same as my original 1KB version), but with no tinsel https://files.catbox.moe/4hyvqb.webp (new winner!)
• 20% res (same as my original 2KB version) https://files.catbox.moe/6b4ha1.webp

The maximum color quantization you can do on this image without huge information errors is something like:

• 1x yellow-brown for stars / streamers / shorts / socks
• 1x brown for tree base (though it might be better to remove the base to save a color)
• 1x red for baubles / hat / sweater / shoes
• 1x green for tree
• 1x blue for hair (potentially you could merge the tree color if you want to really push it)
• 1x skin tone for skin
• 1x pink for mouth
• 1x black for lines
• 1x light yellow for background

Which is 9 total colors. This would also require living with aliased text ( c r u n c h y ), since it would be data-expensive to add extra shades of gray. At that point you're no longer making a low-quality copy of the original - you'd basically be making a pixel art version of it since you can't afford any colors for anti-aliasing and gradients.

Here's an example PNG with 9 unique colors and some pretty simple patterns without huge information density: https://files.catbox.moe/bj0acl.png

Even that's 1,847 bytes! (i.e., basically 2KB)

Edit: I made a big (in hindsight, obvious) mistake by forgetting I can literally just change the bit depth of the image when saving, so the example I've provided is actually very inefficient by comparison. Valmond has set me straight.

Spending too long editing 1KB images is the true meaning of Christmas

It's quite challenging to keep the text legible within a 1KB limit. Here I manually removed a few details that more-or-less weren't visible post-compression anyway, then cut the color palette a little. You have to use such a low resolution with such high compression that almost everything gets amputated to keep the text kinda-readable (and even AVIF and JPEG XL (which are usually better than WebP) struggled, at least in my editor): https://files.catbox.moe/eyp2w7.webp

If you can live with 2KB, you don't have to amputate nearly as much: https://files.catbox.moe/g5htfo.webp

In both cases I manually reconstructed the top of the star, but that's a bit "extra" lol.

And just for comparison, no text and 10KB at "full" res: https://files.catbox.moe/9bkn21.webp

The same thing but half res (more optimal at this file size): https://files.catbox.moe/cac65u.webp

Valmond's implicit suggestion of not just quantizing as a pre-processing step (which is what I foolishly did), but actually reducing the saved bit depth of the image might give you something that looks much better overall than what any of the WebP versions we've been playing with here do - if you put in more effort!

Here's an example of a not-fully-optimized implementation that gets down to ~2.5KB as a PNG, or ~2KB as a lossless WebP (i.e., the two images are identical in quality):

• https://files.catbox.moe/pjedam.png
• https://files.catbox.moe/ua0qnh.webp

With some judicious manual optimization (which I haven't done here), it's plausible you could get this down to 1KB with better overall fidelity than the lossy WebP versions we've been playing with. Not 100% sure, as optimizing images for file sizes this small is not really my wheelhouse!

My main concern with this approach is that you're bottlenecked by resolution - large areas of plain color have a hard limit on their compression with PNG, but lossy compression can go wild with stuff like that.

The process described and shown by the screenshots does seem a bit much for a cancellation. Suing feels disproportionate when I first hear it, but are there many other recourses to force it to become more user friendly?

The decentralization is good if you can get the numbers high enough for the individual communities to be useful, but having them concentrated creates a mini network effect, where each user is automatically exposed to all of the local communities, which would be harder to seek out and find individually. So I think there's tradeoffs, and mostly-centralized and mostly-decentralized community-instance pairing both have pros and cons.