MC_Lovecraft @ MC_Lovecraft @lemm.ee

I review movies over on [Letterboxd](https://letterboxd.com/MC_Lovecraft/)

---

Read more

Posts

21

Comments

65

Joined

2 yr. ago

Thanks, I'll be posting them here, as well as to my Letterboxd and a few other forums. If you haven't read them already, you can find my reviews of the other Halloween movies (and others) here.

Unironically the best entry in the series. I play 5 occasionally, but 3 all the time.

I'm watching them all before the 31st. I am prepared for the high-water mark to be behind me at this point. I remember enjoying H20, but I saw it so long ago that that impression means nothing. I've heard good things about the most recent reboot trilogy, but I'll have to make it through Rob Zombie-land before I get there.

The difference is that 'color-blind' liberals who co-opt the language and appearance of the civil rights movement without actually understanding or living the ideals behind it were the target of the joke, it wasn't supposed to be funny just because it was blackface. I feel that the backlash to that movie is 100% the result of a lack of media literacy. Like, it's not Citizen Kane, but to accuse Downey Jr. of racism for taking that role is to miss the point so hard it's hard to imagine that the people who feel that way watched the same movie that I did. You have to be coming from a place of total refusal to engage with the subtext (or really just the text, absolutely nothing about Tropic Thunder is subtle in the least) of the work, and an axiomatic understanding of certain actions as always-racist without regard for context.

God I miss dollar theaters. The last one I know about closed down in 2012, but for about a year I saw movies there almost every weekend. They would get the reels from the local cinemark after they had run there, and they ran two screens all day, starting at 9am. The local film society would screen cult classics there too, and I saw some things I would never have discovered on my own. It's a little slice of the human experience that is just kinda gone now.

In 1986, they first met Lynch (a.k.a. Kathleen, a.k.a. Ta-Da the Shit Lady), who was then working at a strip club called Sex World in New York City.[75] Though never an official member, she became Butthole Surfers' famous "naked dancer", performing intermittently with them through 1989.[9] One show in Washington, D.C., with GWAR saw Kathleen take the stage to dance in nothing but gold body paint and antique wooden snow shoes. At another particularly wild concert in 1986, Haynes and Lynch, by now completely bald, reportedly engaged in sexual intercourse while on stage, as Leary used a screwdriver to vandalize the club's speakers. This came after only five songs, during which time Haynes had started a small fire.

I don't know if it's the absolute best, but the page for the band The Butthole Surfers is pretty excellent.

He's not in a lot of stuff, but every time I see him I'm like 'That dick, he let all the goddamn ghosts out!'

Edit: Also, "It's true. This man has no dick."

It's a shame they don't use this song in the film. Most likely due to how much this one leans into the 1980's techno-thriller tropes, using such an iconic 60's song might have clashed with that theme, although I'm sure a good director could do it in a way that worked.

I've been giving this some thought (far more than it actually merits, but that's what I'm here for) and I realized that I don't know how Michael knows that Laurie is his sister. She was two years old when he killed Judith, so there's no way he recognized her (discounting a supernatural connection, which would be a totally valid explanation in this series) at 17. In the intervening time, he clearly learned some things about the world (like how to drive, and what Samhain means) but I think it would be very strange if Dr. Loomis were telling him anything about his family, at least after the first few years of their relationship, given the way that Loomis talks about Michael. So he should have no idea that his parents are dead, or that Laurie was adopted by another family in Haddonfield. In fact, we don't know for sure that Laurie is even the same name he knew her by. She was adopted at four, but I can imagine the adoptive parents changing her name to try and shield her a bit from the notoriety of her birth family.

So, Michael shows up at his childhood home, ready to finish the job he started fifteen years earlier, but finds it empty, something he probably never even considered. Then, a girl about the same age as his remaining sister would be, who another person calls Laurie within his hearing (assuming this is actually her birth name here), just happens to turn up on the house's doorstep? I think he decided in that moment that Laurie was his sister, and that he was going to kill her, completely absent any hard evidence to back that conclusion up. He happened to be right, but that's probably down to Fate or some bullshit, not any actual knowledge that Michael possessed. From there, the only other people he kills in the first movie are canoodling teenagers, which is what (apparently) set him off in the first place, and he uses them to make a shrine to Judith, which makes me think their murders were really just auxiliary crimes, subordinant to his true goal of offing Laurie and making her the centerpiece of his Idol.

In any case, I no longer know whether this plot element makes any sense at all, but I'm pretty sure I need to just move on to the one without Michael, to wipe my brain clean and smooth again.

I'm happy to have it in my collection for completeness' sake, but yeah, it does not leave you feeling good about yourself afterwards (or at any point during, really). The closest thing I can compare the experience to is Requiem For a Dream, which I love, but very rarely re-watch because of just how gross and bad it makes me feel. Requiem is by far the superior film though, and actually worth an occasional revisit.

Well, mine doesn’t, so there you go, I guess. You’ll never see me review a film highly just because it is already well regarded, and I try to make a good case for the ratings that I give. That said, no movie is for everyone, and that tends to be particularly true when it comes to horror.

I’ve actually seen it, and that’s probably where I got the idea.

For what it's worth, this isn't a particularly 'scary' movie. It is hard to watch for a lot of reasons, but having just rewatched the original Halloween, that movie is much scarier than this one.

You know, I hadn't even though of that. That is an interesting parallel!

The only one without Michael Myers in it is your favorite? I don't hate 3, but I don't understand the appeal either.

Yup. I left at the end of June, and would have left immediately if they had fucked with old.reddit at any point. I only see the site now when it comes up in search results and seeing what Reddit looks like now instantly assuaged any doubts I had about leaving.

I love Every Frame a Painting, I'll definitely give that a watch, thanks!

I've heard good things about the Labyrinth cut. A few years ago I found a fan-edit of the whole prequel trilogy that aims to do the same thing. It edits the three films together for a runtime of just over three hours, and it's a glory to behold. Supposedly it was based on Topher Grace's personal fan edit, but I don't think he ever released his on the internet.