Wasn't you then, cool. It's been a while since this nonsense started. Even worse though, you brought up an entirely different thing out of nowhere. Have a nice life.
If I've ever seen the same post 5 times, it was in a day or two and it was a new and exciting thing for some people so everybody would post it and the same time.
I asked my guide what their qualifications for being a guide were and they ignored me. Then they wanted me to subscribe to I don't know what and they're not telling me what. The only answer I got was "//starrekgameblogger1075634829" (yes, "starrek", [sic]) and now my guide is pretending to not know what that means.
I'm from the 21st century, we're cynical about technology.
Edit: oooh and now I got a random popup asking me for money.
The AI would still need to understand feelings, at least in principle, in order to interpret your actions which are based on feelings. Even "I like having sex with her" is a feeling. A purely rational mind would probably reprimand you for using contraception because what is the point of sex if not making offspring?
Since Youtube is what we were talking about, I see no reason to assume that wasn't what you were talking about. Also, I do think that the principle can be applied in most situations, some more easily, some less.
What? The original argument was "Just because it exists doesn’t make it good.", implying that it (click-bait thumbnails) doesn't necessarily work. To which I said that the fact that it exists means it works. To which you seemed to object by saying that there may be people who have an interest in it existing - like they want it to exist despite it actually not working. I'm confused about what it is you're saying.
Very few things are true for every person with a given neurodivergence. But this is one of the more (most?) common things that people with ADHD struggle with, some to a lesser, some to a greater extent.
It's not "hard to understand", I was just interested in your reasons because I thought it was curious. I still don't agree that it's a big deal - I also consume mostly English-language media and most of my communication online is in English but I'm still typing this on my Handybildschirm. But you do you.
Duolingo in general isn't very good for learning a language. Their approach doesn't work because what explanation there is is sparse and not in depth enough. They expect the user to recognise patterns on their own but that frequently causes people to see patterns that aren't there and to misunderstand grammar points. It might be an okay-ish tool to practice what you already know.
If you were successful with Duolingo, congrats, you were lucky.
Ever since I realized what it means in english-speaking countries, I stopped saying it.
Why? Why would it matter what a word means if interpreted via another language? I mean, you go ahead and do what you want, I don't care, but I'd like to understand the reasoning behind that.
Wasn't you then, cool. It's been a while since this nonsense started. Even worse though, you brought up an entirely different thing out of nowhere. Have a nice life.