Lumidaub @ Lumidaub @feddit.de

sie/ihr, she/her

---

Read more

Posts

4

Comments

232

Joined

2 yr. ago

What is up with shaming people for caring about something they did not care about before? Do you want them to stop caring? At least they do now, can't that be enough?

IIRC that was a popular opinion about artificial sweeteners for a while because pigs are raised on food with sweeteners, to make them eat more. That doesn't mean sweeteners make you hungrier though, just that pigs like to eat sweet things so they eat more of it.

Fido has warez if you have treat?

Thankfully the phone regularly probes home to fix this sort of mess

Not for the purpose of giving it to the people.

Get thee behind me, Satan, I shall be strong and resist and wait for the episode.

horseback was believed to be capable of rupturing the hymen

It can do that but that's only of any interest if you think a piece of skin is important.

Wait, sorry, I'm trying to understand. It's "based on a verse from Muhammad" but it's not in the Quran? Where is the verse then? And why does not being in the Quran invalidate it if it's by Muhammad?

yes but porn

Sharing contact information directly phone to phone.

Lock screen widgets, giving me information at an actual glance without the risk of getting sucked into other random bullshit.

Not a problem at all, but it does sound curious on the surface, don't you think? ;)

Well yes. There are people who receive money from reddit in exchange for services rendered, making reddit a legitimate company that can be held to higher standards. And then there are the mods (who, as we all know, are le ghey) who need to be protected from this fact of reality at all costs.

The difference being that one is a system held together by volunteers, spit and floss, dreams and hopes, the other is a major website that pays people real world money to prevent shit from happening. (also, don't reddit)

Thank you for saving everyone a click.

Pardon? "Why" what?

Yeah, I should probably qualify and say "one of the bigger, more stable currencies". From what I know about this stuff, which isn't very much admittedly, those seem worthwhile if you don't plan to keep them anyway. I don't care about volatility if I'm not hodling, do I?

It ain’t your job to keep yourself healthy, it’s the job of the government to keep their citizens healthy.

I live in socialist paradise and I still think that's a weird, weird thing to say.

I have absolutely no interest in owning cryptocurrency but if anybody wanted to donate some ETH or BTC or USDC or XKCD or MPH or whatever to me, I'd take it, sure (and then exchange for real world money, obviously). Why would you reject free money? Especially if you're a smaller project that doesn't get too many donations anyway.

They were not questioning the fact that these limits exist though.

Notreadingthatnotreadingthatnotreadingthat because I haven't seen it yet (woe is me). I'm just here to express my amusement about how lately every week we seem to get "the best Star Trek ever" ;D

Edit: Seen it now and daaaang.