LufyCZ @ LufyCZ @lemmy.world

Posts

1

Comments

428

Joined

2 yr. ago

Enlighten me, then.

A quick google search shows, that crime stats are reported by law enforcement agencies. How do these agencies know about crimes? For most crimes, it's gonna be because someone wrote a police report. Who writes police reports? The police.

Makes perfect sense to me

Oh I can definitely understand being mad at some pet owners. It can suuuuck.

But a blanket statement is just disingenuous

If there isn't anyone to write them down, they're not getting included with the stats either.

You sound like a pretty shitty person ngl

The echo chamber of blind rage will one day be the end of lemmy

How did you manage to go even further out of context?

Have you read my comment? Have you thought about what I said? Have you considered the fact that the absolute majority of crime is reported by police departments?

Going off on a completely out of context rant that took you 5 minutes to write doesn't do you any favors, only shows that you want to be mad, regardless of the reason.

Go be mad where it matters.

The governor of said state pardons for state crimes

Think the difference there is that the invoices of the guy from the article were actually fake invoices for real things

Well, crime statistics are gonna be low if there's no one to report crimes to

Edit: y'all are insane, I'm not taking any sides around here, it's just straight up a fact lol

How else am I gonna have a neat.af domain tho

Well don't think there's a point prosecuting someone (i.e. spending insane amounts of taxpayer money) if, in the end, you achieve "nothing", in terms of punishment.

There might still be indirect punishment in terms of a hit to public image but eh

Have you heard of gangs using restaurants as a front for other less legal businesses?

They do still serve pizza there. If it happens to cost $60 and it comes with a sack of white sniffy stuff is another thing.

But yeah keep pushing unlogical shit, it really works if all you're trying to do is scream into a wall.

Again, it doesn't do him any favors.

If you want to push your agenda, that's fine, but piggybacking off of a ruined life (in quite exceptional circumstances all things considered) doesn't do absolutely anything.

What's the point? Should the guy have gotten more? He can live like a king without a care for the rest of his life. If he has children, those can, too.

Or is it that Zuckerberg shouldn't be "allowed" to own his own company, which coincidentally is pretty successful?

Because if it's the latter, it's unrelated to this specific person, you could post it under a cute kitty vid and it'd have the same value.

Yep, fair enough.

Have you heard of hotels? Venues?

Don't let hatred blind your judgement, it makes you look dumb.

Yeah that's very far from the definition of a scam. A bad product isn't a scam, you know exactly what you're getting, it's on you if you "fall" for it.

You're being unrealistic because he received that money over the course of a decade as a payment for actual services, even of the cost of said services might've been inflated to fit the pay offs.

This time, he'd suddenly be receiving stupid amounts of money into the company account, which the fine will be paid from. The same account that's currently (afaik) under the control of US officials.

It's just not that easy.

He built a successful company, that's what he did :)

But still, it doesn't matter, sucks that it happened to the lad, but comparing him to Zuckerberg doesn't do absolutely anything for him, it's completely unrelated to his case.

Sure, it's not gonna be suspicious at all when the company's account receives tens of millions from a random international account.

Be realistic, you're free to hate Trump all you want, I don't like the guy either, but selling state secrets isn't the same as buying a kitkat at a grocery store