From my personal lemmy experience, a lot of people would consider it actual (legal) fraud that's just not being prosecuted because the perpetrator/s are wealthy.
The fact that it's being spent as income doesn't mean it is income.
A company has revenue, which they use to pay people with. It's money they use to get things. But it's not income.
It makes no sense to extend the definition of income to cover money that you personally think works as income or whatever. However, objectively, it doesn't.
As I said, no issue creating a new structure for loaned money, but including it under income is stupid.
It's great you can do it and you're free to, but not using javascript often means revamping the whole codebase and making everything 5x more complicated.
It's about creating at least a small barrier for not-very motivated people.
If a script kiddie wants to create a couple accounts and spam a bit, paying for and integrating such a service might just discourage them from actually taking the time.
Just a small cost if you're dedicated though, for sure
Unfortunately you are very often a liability when not sober.
Teachers would be setting a bad example for kids.
Tradesmen could make fatal mistakes, fuck up your house, cut off their fingers, whatever.
A nurse... think that's obviously.
If you have a house, it has a door which you can use to access everything inside.
If you have a linux install with no services running on it, it has no doors, and thus doesn't need any door locks. And if it does have services running on there (which run publicly), it now has doors, sure, but getting one of those doors open doesn't guarantee access to the whole house - usually it's gonna be an empty room
Look, mom, the next village over is on BBC!
This is absolutely hilarious to me, never would've expected something like it