I know someone that is willing to implement this feature, but they are waiting for merge of rfc to open a Pull Request with initial implementation.
As I understand the RFCs are for defining scope and design requirements for specific feature. And when the design is finalised RFC is merged. Then someone opens a PR to implement it.
If you were imagining some other process it would be beneficial to acknowledge change of development phase from designing to implementing.
P.S. The readme in the repo is supporting my view.
but @dessalines@lemmy.ml and @nutomic@lemmy.ml didn't look at it for months and I don't know what is their stance on it. The dev that wanted to implement it doesn't want to spend energy to push forward for a green light.
Admins are also people end not some soulless corporation. If you write a polite message asking for defederation and provide a reason why. They should take action.
They can't have eyes everywhere so reporting stuff really helps.
Edit:
This needs additional explanation. What was the order of the moves and how did you interpret them.
"Pawns join in class solidarity and rise up against the oppressive monarchy." ❌
"One grain of rice in A1" ✅
"Kings pawn cracks its egg and becomes a queen." ❌
"Castle with the enemy rook." ✅
"All previously played moves get played again." ✅
"White queen has a mental breakdown and enters an emo phase for the next 6 turns" ❌
"All pawns undergo mitosis. One of them had a mutation and promotes to a knook." ❌
There are two additional queens from nowhere, while no kings are present. That wasn't in any move.
There is an official polish Neon Genesis Evangelion voiceover that aired on TV once. All the other versions are with subtitles.