They could easily all be giving their honest opinion at IGN: if the reviewers who tend to like everything are the ones who don't get fired, the output of mostly positive (or sometimes groupthink negative) reviews would be the same, even if individual reviewers never lied.
Voice actors are among "those who actually make the games." Voice acting in particular also is strenuous work that can and does cause physical injury when workers are compelled to work long hours doing rough voices and so on. People end up having to have surgery on their vocal cords.
We don't need to devalue voice actors to value other game industry workers. The only difference is the voice actors organized first, probably because of the injury risk, and when you form a union you have to define a group that you can reach and coordinate. It shouldn't be an us vs them among works.
I think difficulty setting, how often you get into combat, and how far you are into the game might affect it. In my playthrough it was fine for a long time but now every now and then it hangs a bit when it's calculating enemy turns, even with my good CPU.
You make a good point in general, but this particular case is about preventing non-scientologists from treating the 'religious object' devices how they will, not about the scientologists being at all restricted in their own handling of the objects (as would be comparable to illegal drugs or animal sacrifice used in religious rituals).
This case in particular is comparable to requesting that the government outlaw the modification or destruction of the Bible or Qoran, even by people who own their own copy of a religious text. It would require non-adherants to a religion to treat that religion's objects as sacred and to do so in the specific manner prescribed by that religion. This is contrary to precedent and law established by cases against people who've burnt their own personal copies of the bible, or created derivative works making fun of the bible, and so on.
There isn't an unbiased metric in existance, not when intelligence is itself so ill-defined and nebulous.
You can't reduce it down to a number or set of numbers without making judgements about what intelligence is and isn't, or what the numbers represent specifically, or without making judgements about how to take the measurements. These judgements cannot be made but through the lens of the culture and individual life experience of judge(s). And when it comes to research on topics like this there is simply no way to truly isolate any measurable quantity out as being inherently caused by biology vs external factors. Humans are messy and hard to sort neatly.
If anything, the comic more-so reflects what happens to kids who grow up getting told they're gifted and praised for being inherently smart rather than for working hard or other such things that they can actually exert any control over, thus producing kids who are terrified of not being as smart as they're told they are or as "successful" as they've been expected to be, who grow up to fret about their failures or perceived failures. Or to kids who have or believe themselves a great deal of potential but cannot realize it for other reasons, be they economic, geopolitical, familial or whatever.
Do you have an alternative that isn't google? Because google's DNS privacy policy is much worse.
I don't like cloudflare, but their DNS terms are relatively good, and they have my info anyway because as you say, they're everywhere. I don't think my not using their DNS will make any appreciable mark on their business, either.
Sometimes I wonder whether an online community made of anonymous individuals who don't and won't ever know each other, nor even recognize each other, isn't a fool's errand. People are all-too willing to shout carelessly into the mist, as if their words can't affect real people. At least with irl communities, there is a pressure not to insult each other to one another's faces.
This isn't to say social media is all bad, not at all. But I wonder if "community" is really possible in any kind of meaningful way, or in the long term.
All my favorite internet forums held on by being small and having solid rules and moderation, and then as they grow, and more and more strangers join the mix, it slowly falls apart.
I understand this take. For me, though, I wasn't willing to let reddit to continue to make ad revenue from my posts/comments (e.g. from their turning up in google search results) or sell them for LLM-shenanigans (of course, my comments can be scraped off lemmy just the same, but at least a megacorp isn't claiming ownership over them).
I don't regret it at all, either. It feels rather refreshing to not have that trail floating around on the internet anymore (well, mostly. I'm sure I didn't catch everything.)
That's been me, too. I'll pop in here sometimes, but overall the whole thing has ended up making me realize that social media as a whole just... Isn't that great, actually. It's a constant stream of little things, many of them things to be upset about that I can't do anything about.
I've been spending more time instead on things like reading, that require prolonged focus on one thing, and damn if I don't feel better this way.
Also... Beehaw and lemmy in general seems to have gotten even more tilted into hardcore FOSS/privacy/Linux culture, which is the opposite of what I hoped would happen. Privacy is important to me but I dislike Linux and I just don't prioritize it in the way that a lot of people here do, such that they're talking about it what feels like all the time to the exclusion of other topics.
Still, I remain here enough to type this comment. shrug
I want to try Tildes instead maybe but I think that's still invite-only.
"No straws at all are better" makes sense until you remember they are vitally important for a lot of disabled or elderly people with mobility/coordination issues. Some people need straws, or they can't drink independently, or can't drink without spilling, and the current normalization and availability of straws means that they can use what is for them an accessibility device without anyone questioning it.
And straws are hardly an issue compared to most other things.
Anyway yeah, agreed that "this supposedly eco friendly thing is actually eco hostile, therefore we shouldn't try for eco friendly" is a nonsense take.
Yeah. If you play a lot of little indie games, and tend to only play through them once, it's an absurd bargain.
It's also great in that you can try a lot of stuff without having to research it at all first, so you get really nice surprises sometimes. And you can try things risk-free, so sometimes I'll try something I wouldn't have expected to like and wouldn't have bought and be pleasantly surprised. It can open up entire genres to people this way, as an intro to different types of games.
I do tend to buy a month or two, drop out, then buy another month when the catalogue is different though.
This also still happens sometimes with shit like motion detectors for automatic/touchless sinks and paper dispensers, when they're designed and tested by by white people who don't make sure they'll detect black hands.
On a related note, if you search, you can find a lot of articles/podcast eps/etc about the differences in how people respond to vocal fry and upspeak depending on if it comes from a man or a woman.
For even the buggiest of games, there will always be a subset of day 1 purchasers who buy the game and play it for hours and truly don't experience any bugs out of sheer luck.
They could easily all be giving their honest opinion at IGN: if the reviewers who tend to like everything are the ones who don't get fired, the output of mostly positive (or sometimes groupthink negative) reviews would be the same, even if individual reviewers never lied.