I'm sure in addition to what's been publicly stated as happening right now being indefensible even to the most in-denial people out there (at least out of those who want to be able to believably claim they care at all about human rights), it helps that in the UK at least, cases have been moving forward against war criminals with dual citizenship. (Identified "veterans" of the genocidal campaign have been charged elsewhere as well but I haven't heard how those cases are progressing yet.)
Actually, from recent reports I've seen, it seems it's Smith trying to save her own butt because much of her party wants this and is at risk of splitting up if they don't get their way.
She's said a referendum would be an "outlet" to let them feel heard, but she's obviously playing with fire. (Fwiw, Smith says she isn't for secession herself, but take that as you will.) If she was responsible and cared at all about her province and country, she'd be trying to put that fire out (aiming for a unity moment), rather than fanning the flames.
Oh, I didn't realize you were using colloquial English there.
Actually, "lay" is the past tense of "lie," AND "lay" is a separate verb from "lie." Most people will incorrectly (for formal English anyway) confuse the two verbs, using transitive "lay" when they mean to be using the intransitive "lie." (E.g. "She lays down" is not a valid conjugation in formal English, and should be "She lies down." If she's putting something else down though, "She lays it down."
Here are the respective conjugation charts for both verbs, if you want:
In some regional or cultural dialects though, maybe it's all "lay?" I grew up with (and taught) more formal English but I do try to respect established differences in standard Englishes (as long as I'm aware of them). :)
Absolutely. The name changes are because reactionaries keep attacking those names and progressives keep on not standing up to these attacks and defending those terms.
Of course, deep-pocketed folks who want to divide the people are funding reactionary messaging but I'm getting to think more and more the bigger problem is that those on the people's side who would best communicate these things are exactly the ones who don't have the time and energy to be involved in communication. So instead it's either inadvertently condescending talk-downs or wishy-washy and corporate-sounding slogans from people who might just a bit too far removed from the actual problems at hand.
I have seen the aftermath from when someone rolled her foot in platform heels. (I was nearby, but didn't see her foot go perpendicular to her leg like I heard about afterwards.) It was many years ago and I don't think of it often, but I don't recall ever buying any kind of platform shoe ever again after that.
Horribly vague headline, but excellent piece as far as I could read for now (not feeling well today and my head's starting to hurt). I look forward to reading the rest of the details on those recommendations. I hope the party listens to this kid!
Absolutely. Major media is helpful only to confirm basic facts, while touting stale and one-sided opinions, so we need to make inroads in other ways. Folks who are good with memes can tear into the CPC's lies about who they've really represented from the beginning (while also tearing into the LPC's failures to live up to their promises). Meanwhile, connected folks in blue collar industries and services ideally could get more facts out. It is a big problem how well-meaning professionals-- who tend to snatch up party leadership positions-- regularly and routinely disrespect and alienate other working people without even realizing it.
The term sodomy on its own usually means anal sex, but in this particular case, the verb form "sodomize" is indeed referring to
::: spoiler spoiler
anal rape.
:::
Before the election, I was able to see this multiple poll breakdown that was kind of surprising. If you were under 35 and male, you were more likely to have voted CPC. Every other group (esp. women under 35 and everyone over 65) was more likely to vote LPC. This tells me Poilievre's social media campaign, which you may recall was highly "manosphere"-coded was effective with the target group. The good news then is that (while not making the same mistake as the CPC and forgetting other demographics exist), we can reach these people with a smart approach online.
I think Rational National has a good point in that video I linked that maybe these folks who were taken in by the Conservatives were under the impression because the Liberals were in charge as long as they can remember, everything is solely their fault. They're likely missing the overall historical context that we can't afford to keep the tax burden on poor people (especially as wages stagnate) instead of the rich (whose incomes have been exploding up until Trump's market crashes) as we've been doing increasingly for decades upon decades.
They don't want Gemini, so they stated probably the best way to avoid having Gemini. It's a privacy-minded comment. Despite being Google's own phone, Pixels may be the only phones you can unlock to flash with a different ROM (GrapheneOS) and then be able to lock again after for security.
True. We've only kicked the can down the road at best with this election, so this has been on my mind as more important than ever right now. But even if we get a good form of proportional representation, we can't get complacent. We still have to win a war of ideas.
Prominent supporters of the CPC here in Canada want to implement a (faster!) DOGE-like process. It's also very concerning that Labour in the UK (rough equivalent to our LPC) is slashing survival-necessary benefits for disabled young people, and their ascending Reform Company-that-runs-as-a-party is championing a Trump-style agenda. Australia's Liberal party (rough equivalent to CPC) wanted to do the same, but luckily there's been a backlash.
For now, Australia looks likely to follow what we did and re-elect their Labour party (LPC equivalent) as government. Soon, people in the US won't be able to avoid the reality of a massive wave of layoffs starting at docks and the transportation sector and fanning its way out across supply chains (unless they can somehow miraculously head this off or their manufacturing sector proves more resilient). Maybe global opinion will change then, but there's always the risk we'll get even more of the same push we've had for decades upon decades from every major party: "Slashing taxes for the rich and cutting services didn't work? Guess we have to do it even harder!"
That's not what their base believes. There is a whole other fantasy reality in their channels about how Carney has planned all along to cut a secret deal with Trump after the election. Other justification narratives probably exist as well, because they have to keep people believing that obviously, everyone knows we couldn't possibly do anything other than completely fold into Trump's plans. They spew propagandistic garbage like this and teach people to distrust legit media that understands context and checks facts rather than running with conspiracy theories based on flimsy evidence.
Also, while it's true there may have been too much immigration in a short time, that's not a primary reason for housing costs rising. Asset prices are going up because homes are treated as an investment. At least according to graphs in this Breach video, there's been no correlation between immigration and housing costs.
Economist Gary Stevenson has outlined many times as well how homes increasing in value for an extended period of time can actually be seen as a precursor to a shrinking middle class, though middle class people often don't see increasing pricing as a feature of wealthier buyers out-competing them.
I had it here in Canada, decades ago. My memories are vague but I remember thinking it wasn't bad at all. (Probably no lung, but there was definitely stomach.)
"Unalived" might be a euphemism that's only necessary on certain social media to avoid censorship nowadays, but people were using the term "disappearing" (especially as a transitive verb) during Chile's Pinochet regime, if not earlier.
I probably wouldn't have tried durian or nattou if I didn't know what they were, but maybe I'll notice some exception some day. (I might have still tried haggis since I don't recall it having any smell to it, but I wouldn't feel better not knowing what it was.)
I don't know if it has that effect normally or you mean it would be laced, but they probably wouldn't eat a strong-smelling food in the first place. (Speaking for myself though, I sure would try as long as I know what it is.)
I'm sure in addition to what's been publicly stated as happening right now being indefensible even to the most in-denial people out there (at least out of those who want to be able to believably claim they care at all about human rights), it helps that in the UK at least, cases have been moving forward against war criminals with dual citizenship. (Identified "veterans" of the genocidal campaign have been charged elsewhere as well but I haven't heard how those cases are progressing yet.)