Linkerbaan @ Linkerbaan @lemmy.world

Fast left

---

Read more

Posts

775

Comments

6,071

Joined

2 yr. ago

9/11 in itself would not be as sketchy if they did not use it as pretext to force through a ton of privacy violation laws which just so happened to be ready and only needed an excuse. And invade the middle east with a convenient pretext. And the FBI having advance warnings about 9/11 which were ignored.

I don't care about whether it was jet fuel or pre planted explosives. 9/11 was used as an excuse to invade countries which we now know had nothing to do with it. And at the time the government knew they were lying about those countries complicity. So I still believe there is more to the story than what is made public.

Yet another very low activity account shows up after a long hiatus. How coincidental.

People dislike it when someone says Genocide is bad? Sounds like those people have issues.

Karma is no longer a problem.

Accounts which return from their months long break to suddenly very actively support Kamala Harris and stalk my account moreso.

On an entirely different instance. Since so many people enjoyed it I felt compelled to share it here as well.

You sure know a lot about my posts for an account that posts so little.

Most killed by israel is likely an exaggeration. But certainly a lot. From the recent ABC news article:

This was a mass Hannibal. It was tons and tons of openings in the fence, and thousands of people in every type of vehicle, some with hostages and some without," Colonel Erez said.

Air force pilots described to Yedioth Ahronot newspaper the firing of "tremendous" amounts of ammunition on October 7 at people attempting to cross the border between Gaza and Israel.

"Twenty-eight fighter helicopters shot over the course of the day all of the ammunition in their bellies, in renewed runs to rearm. We are talking about hundreds of 30-millimetre cannon mortars and Hellfire missiles," reporter Yoav Zeitoun said.

An Apache helicopter carries around1300 rounds in munition. So 28*1300 shots and that multiple times. Israel has not released friendly fire data 11 months after so you can bet things are very fishy.

Do you have a better term to describe people supporting the systematic murder and ethnic cleansing of people trapped in a concentration camp?

Nazi is the most accurate term to describe Harris and Trump.

Your Reuters link is actually a great example of why I choose not to use their article. and use a better Iranian news source.

Anyone reading the Reuters headline would think there was some kind of "standoff battle" betweeen the UN and IDF, instead of israel firing at aid workers and ramming them with bulldozers without provocation.

Maybe Kamala should try not to be racist then the headline would be 'Kamala refuted Trumps racist lie that immigration is bad'.

16:42 extremely interesting quote. Thanks for linking

No never. Softonic repackages existing programs with a malware bundle.

This has to be the best election for Democrats to capitalize on embracing their desired Fascism.

The Blue MAGA cult will justify and even evangelize anything Democrats say without question because muh Trump.

I thought he was referring to more frequent color blindness in males

No she was not.

You literally linked the article with the statement yourself. Read it. You don't want a highlighted image right?

Calling people who protest Russian trolls never gets you banned on Lemmy.world by the way.

Wonder what happens when you call those people Zionist trolls...

Patten was invited while the UN investigative envoy was blocked. Her report and cites israeli statements has no legal validity. Patten herself said this in the article you linked earlier which you hopefully read.

The UN report was published after Pattens report. If Pattens report contained evidence the UN investigative envoy would have cited it.

Once again, the UN confirmed there is no evidence.

If they cannot verify evidence for its authenticity then they have not seen evidence. Evidence is when you can verify something is true not taking israeli propaganda without checking it.

Israel is the party who blocked the UN investigation from gathering evidence. Bit wild to believe the claims of the people blocking access to the "evidence".

We look at specific pieces of evidence, not who is saying it.

Once again, what evidence?

No the legal UN investigation found no evidence of rape they're stating that pretty clearly. Not "some"

it just has not been independently verified

Trump also has evidence of immigrants eating dogs. It's just "not independently verified."

I doubt every news source if they make claims without sources not just Iranian ones. Especially since most mainstream newspapers "anonymous source" turns out to be the IDF.

In this case the source is stated

UN spokesman Stéphane Dujarric told reporters