Lifter @ Lifter @discuss.tchncs.de

Posts

1

Comments

353

Joined

2 yr. ago

It's the "don't mess it up" part that is harder.

So there is still time...

They solved that by having most of the game revert to starting positions frequently (e.g. every time you die, area load).

Maybe not as immersive as Bethesda games but their lore at least tries to make sense of it.

It's more like playing the Edge of Tomorrow movie, you need to learn where everything is.

That's harder to implement. Suddenly you need to store that extra state somewhere and don't mess it up. The last save should already have a timestamp and is immutable. A lot less likely to get bugs that way.

It does though, their most profitable (as in profit margin) businesses areas are the subscription based services and charging.

https://www.energyandcapital.com/tesla-fsd/#%3A%7E%3Atext=This+would+result+in+approximately%2Ca+year+from+charging+services.

Mimic, perhaps inspired but neural nets in machine learning doesn't work at all like real neural nets. They are just variables in a huge matrix multiplication.

FYI, I do have a Master's degree in Machine Learning.

I disagree. Machines aren't "learning". You are anthropomorphising theem. They are storing the original works, just in a very convoluted way which makes it hard to know which works were used when generating a new one.

I tend to see it as they used "all the works" they trained on.

For the sake of argument, assume I could make an "AI" mesh together images but then only train it on two famous works of art. It would spit out a split screen of half the first one to the left and half of the other to the right. This would clearly be recognized as copying the original works but it would be a "new piece of art", right?

What if we add more images? At some point it would just be a jumbled mess, but still consist wholly of copies of original art. It would just be harder to demonstrate.

Morally - not practically - is the sophistication of the AI in jumbling the images together really what should constitute fair use?

Many licences have different rules for redistribution, which I think is fair. The site is free to use but it's not fair to copy all the data and make a competitive site.

Of course wikipedia could make such a license. I don't think they have though.

How is the lack of infrastructure an argument for allowing something morally incorrect? We can take that argument to absurdum by saying there are more people with guns than there are cops - therefore killing must be morally correct.

Sp'Flayed?

Rookie numbers. France alone has over 40000, according to this: https://www.discovercars.com/blog/roundabouts

The right to repair laws will take effect in (at the latest) July 30 2026.

Manufactures have until then to decide what to do. Maybe Apple will just straight pull out of EU or comply by then.

It's a painfully slow process but better than not even trying like all other states on this planet.

Edit: source https://commission.europa.eu/law/law-topic/consumer-protection-law/directive-repair-goods_en

And the lawsuits keep pouring in.

That's was probably a dad joke. And maybe you missed it on purpose but will point it out anyway.

Also a guard against corruption. It's much harder to keep bribing random jurors than getting and keeping "Jurors" that you can control. See the US Supreme Court as a cautionary tale.

Småland is also where the first IKEA was founded.

Hve you heard of GDPR? USB-C mandate? Right to repair?

soxpooping

There are plenty faces if you look for them!

Or just "Name". Not all people have a clear first and last name.

It may also be cheaper because they only run (and acal) when needed, instead of having a few extra servers running "just in case".