Leviathan @ Leviathan @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

709

Joined

2 yr. ago

Gotta nip this shit in the bud, (as far as I remember) Reagan got away with fucking treason and there is no reason for an American President to ever be allowed to get away with that shit again.

Silver?

Pathetic.

There's different types of weird. There's uncle bad touch weird, and there's I like to collect insects and stage little lectures for my dogs on my day off weird. Different weirds.

Spot on, dude is weird as fuck. I wouldn't leave him alone with a woman who wasn't absolutely gushing with consent

I'm part of the rest of society and I agree with their methods. I haven't been propagandized into thinking protests shouldn't be disruptive (ignorable). They've got you thinking minor inconvenience = utter contempt (which for some reason you chose to write two comments in a row), and that for some reason deserves prison time.

Think about it, really, imagine this was coming from someone you respect enough to make you consider changing your mind; should protests that cause no bodily harm be a criminal offence? Should the people not have a way to truly disrupt the system if our existence is at stake? Is the convenience of the ignorant more important than our survival? I'd love to hear your honest answers to these questions.

I really don't mind if the mildly inconvenienced thousands of people. If in a functioning democracy our powers are threefold - the vote, the media and protest, and peaceful protest by its very nature is a protest that can be ignored, then no change can be affected by non disruptive protest. In my opinion this isn't disruptive enough. If we treated this climate crisis with the urgency it deserves then we would take a page out of the European book and block highways with concrete bollards.

Make no mistake, our children will burn and we're worried about missing a flight.

I think it's safe to say that if they gave up their freedom for the cause of trying to save us and our descendants from climate catastrophe then they are absolutely morally superior to both of us. The mistake you make is thinking that the law has a single thing to do with moral superiority, it only deals in financial superiority.

What an absolutely tone deaf and patronizing statement. The world is ending but god forbid we inconvenience anyone while trying to do something about it.

You think that thing, held together by duct tape and bobby pins, is living to 2028?

It's Greek, not Latin. It should be octopodes.

It is octopodes. It's Greek and it follows the Greek pluralisation convention.

Philosophical phantasm, they know but accepting it's true in a real sense would cause them to have an identity crisis.

I grew up on a farm, I've killed and slaughtered my own food my whole life and I always felt good about eating meat because of that fact.

As I get older I'm really starting to hate killing things, I don't want to end a life at all. My couple of vegetarian days might turn into a whole lifestyle.

Of course, young men were starting to be much too peaceful and open-minded.

I agree. All of this shit is divisive.

I just never saw why he would. The people voting for him are cultists. The people against him have already been disgusted by him in one way or another, I just can't imagine how getting grazed would change their minds.

I'm actually incredibly excited to hear how the Conspiracy peddlers spin this, we'll study this level of crazy forever.

He's not dead? Ok, cool. Business as usual.

Robertson is superior.

Robertson is superior to all.