Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)LE
Posts
65
Comments
1,003
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • I've seen people say there's good weird and bad weird, and if you don't mind calling yourself weird it's probably the good kind.

    As for calling maga people weird I think it's effective because their whole deal is about vibes. "We're strong, we're smart" and it really bothers them to be perceived otherwise. It's also not something you can "debate". Either people accept it or they don't. What are you going to say "no, I'm not weird"? Sure thing buddy.

  • I think the issue they're raising is that these clips aren't from porn, they're from movies that happen to have nude scenes. They argue that taking the nude scene out of the larger context is molesting them.

    I can understand not liking it, but I don't see how it would be unexpected.

  • Impressive, but seems destined to fall apart. Companies like Spotify presumably have a sense of how "normal" users listen to music. You'd have to spend a fair amount of time mimicking that or you'd get found out eventually. (As he did)

  • You're right, doesn't sound great. In the example they shared, sounds like the issue wasn't that the car couldn't drive around the fire truck, but that it couldn't break a programming rule about crossing into a lane that would normally be opposing traffic. Once given the "ok" to follow such a route, the car handled it on its own, the human doesn't actually drive it.

    I could imagine a scenario where you need one human operator for every two vehicles. That's still reducing labor by 50%.

    Obviously they want it to be better than that, they want it to be one operator per ten vehicles or no operator at all.

    And the fundamental problem with these systems is they will be owned by big corporations, and any gained efficiency will be consumed by the corporation, not enjoyed by the worker or passed on to the customer.

    But I think there's true value to be found there. Imagine a transportation cooperative - we're a thousand households, we don't all need our own car, but we need a car sometimes. We pool our resources and have a small fleet that minimizes our cost and environmental impact, and potentially drives more safely than human drivers.

  • It could be a career, or religion. For me I was planning to become a pastor, but then became an atheist. It really did throw me off. In my case I think I'm much happier than I would have been, but do kick myself because I could have been positioned much better if I wasn't making plans in this other direction.

  • Every business's biggest expense is labor. Skilled labor costs more. The people in charge like it when you save money.

    I think it's wrong. But only because the interests of the people who own the machines and businesses diverge from the worker's interests. I'd like to see more worker cooperatives. If the workers own the machines, then it's good when things are automated.

    I also don't believe anything will ever be truly automated, or that it's a good idea to try.

    All that to say we don't have to resort to an explanation of "managers must hate engineers" to understand why they would want to eliminate positions.

  • I don't think it's just managers saying hey we could automate such and such a thing away. It's human nature to think "how could I improve this" which almost immediately leads to "if I get this right it could mean no work at all"

  • Sorry you're having this issue. It doesn't line up with my recent experiences with ice cream. I'd recommend trying a different freezer (or multiple different freezers) with the same brand and see if the hardness is different. My bet is it's not cold enough.

  • Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • You absolutely want a keyboard when programming, but you can get one that works with the ipad. As someone else suggested the software environment is probably more the limiting factor.

  • I can see you're frustrated with the handwriting on this prescription, and with them telling you you need a new eye exam. I don't know that folks here can help any more than they have - I've had the same experience where Zenni or Warby Parker wouldn't let me order new glasses without a more recent prescription.

    Seems like the best way to move forward is to get a new exam, and right after verify that you can read what the prescription says. If your eyes are temporarily out of whack afterwards you could bring an acquaintance to read it, or even ask the closest stranger to verify.