Lemming6969 @ Lemming6969 @lemmy.world

Posts

0

Comments

223

Joined

2 yr. ago

There are so many things you want to do or know that you are incapable of knowing or doing because you are too stupid to learn it. No amount of trying will be enough. Your specific brain is incapable. Not everyone has the same abilities to do or learn, but may want to if they could.

I don't see much in there. Doing the simulations is not the same as confirming the simulations. The question wasn't did they do they simulation but rather was any major usable outcome validated. Seems very little if anything.

Banning clothing and makeup is insane. Any judge who upholds such a thing should be removed by any means possible.

Or right now while she is still young, relevant, and still gives a flying fuck. You always strike while the iron's hot.

Next story is the same dog attacking a child.

I've heard zoo keeper can be insanely competitive just to get a $0 internship or even pay money to work there and then the real jobs are also poverty level to work with animals.

You can absolutely know if something external is affecting it. Dark matter and energy might be such a thing. What you might not be able to tell is how those mechanics arise, you'll only know the aggregate result on your layer.

Small natural process, but it's $

But updates for what? You gain very little from security because nobody is targeting you and no new major features, so what's it really worth? Maybe I'm wrong about my perception of those things though... I've used 2 androids for around 8 years each no problem.

Nobody can mop that floor. His voters are not swayed by anything. At best you can eek out a couple points and hope it goes your way at the electoral college level.

No, my issue is that adult literacy is like 20%. Once you consent, condom on, you are now in a situation where whatever happens next is virtually impossible to prove, and proof is required to convict. All cases of withdrawn consent leading to an illegal act for any reason have a very high probability of being unable to be prosecuted due to being indistinguishable from a withdrawn consent compliance scenario or a full consent regret scenario, both are legal. The mere fact that initial consent put you into a sexual position means that either party can claim that consent was given at the time which is how you ended up in that situation to begin with... It becomes he said she said, which is a loss.

The unfortunate truth is no, at least not legally, and regret with consent is not assault.

Can't prove shit. After the fact there is no way to discern between consent revoked after approval and any other scenario.

It's the brainwashing that's the problem.

Actually Cities generally do not consolidate funds to have big enough shows, just a bunch of tiny embarrassing shitty shows.

All melodies are free and open source. At best we can say an entire composition is copyrighted. If I take a composition I like and then make a new composition from it, it's ok, but if a computer does it it's not? That cannot be. It's unfortunate, but that's the direction things will go.

Despite the downvotes, yes. The IRS should be obligated to put out software that can service everyone, in every tax scenario.

Which of you tards didn't get that S10 also has this amazing pay innovation that fills a huge gap... Worth downvotes in an S10 thread? LOL

MST pay is still the only secure way to pay at like 50% of all businesses.