Leate_Wonceslace @ Leate_Wonceslace @lemmy.dbzer0.com

Posts

1

Comments

1,445

Joined

2 yr. ago

Wife

Okay, if you feel embarrassed do something about it. No one's going to stop arguing just because you feel embarrassed. Furthermore, the reason people are bashing people on ml is because their collective behavior has been atrocious. Here's some things you could try:

1. Advocate for a culture of better inter-instance conduct between ml and other platforms (this will likely get you ridiculed and if it ever works, it won't be soon.)
2. Get on an instance that isn't as hostile (highly recommended)
3. Leave the platform (this will produce the most immediate and thorough results)

Edit: ah, look at that, the Russians woke up and the downvotes are pouring in.

You made a comment that you're ashamed of the platform. If that's the case, I encourage you to seek out one more suitable.

👋 Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

It looks like it was run through a generative neural network and then someone added text in an image editor.

Oh boy, cannibalism.

Didn't Feanor fend off 3 of them at the same time along with a large number of Orcs while chasing down Morgoth? IIRC, the way he died was he bled out after his fellows caught up to him a long while later at which time he was still fighting.

Wait, Zelda's on Steam? Why can't I find it?

Resurrected or uploaded.

No, it's the integers Mod 2 (Notation "Z/2Z" where Z is the Integers) which is the only group of order 2 and the smallest non-trivial field.

If you could post them here, I'd appreciate it. I find the problem weird and interesting.

Edit 0: Okay, so the Hamburger is the Integers Mod 2.

Edit 1: I can't be certain, but my guess is that 🌭 is the nth power set of the reals. However, I'm unfamiliar with a topic that naturally contains both Z mod N and a power set of the reals, so I suspect my guess is wrong. Furthermore, I don't know what n could be referring to, other than an arbitrary integer.

Edit 2: The next line has a notation that I'm unfamiliar with, but my guess is that it has to do with Cartesian algebra. I don't know Cartesian algebra, and I'm not even confident I'm remembering the name correctly. I may look into this more later.

Edit 3: Okay, so the final line suggests the line referenced in Edit 2 describes a structure that's comparable to a polynomial ring on the integers Mod 2. Polynomial rings are relatively simple objects that (although most people don't realize it) people often start studying in middle school. Essentially, we're looking at something that behaves like algebra of objects like "2x+1" and "3x+2y+xy+0". I think the main question we should be asking is how many variables this ring has. Given the cardinality of an arbitrary power set of the reals, my assumption is that it's somehow similar to a polynomial ring with some uncountable number of variables. I cannot be certain however.

Honestly? Good for him. It was a garbage art piece anyway. It was literally made just to launder money.

You understand the difference between a civil and common law system is an extremely niche issue that most people engaged in online politics don't really have an opinion on, right?

I called you a fascist accelerationist because you were praising the Trump victory for something that doesn't fucking matter. It's like if you said some deranged like "elephants are a cooler animal than donkeys."

Do you support Russia?

The fact that they were able to lodge those complaints tells me they weren't hit hard enough.

Fascist accelerationist.

Informally, yes. Formally, no. There is no cardinal sufficient such that every cardinal can fit in a set with that cardinality. Isn't that fascinating? There's too many infinities for us to mathematically express how many infinities there are.

Here's the first few things that I had pinned:

https://www.moxfield.com/decks/Cl-d6bw1M0C-xrxQMPV-rw

🎼 The ni~ght we burned ol'Dixie down, and the bells were ringin'. 🎵

🎼 The ni~ght we burned ol'Dixie down, all the people were singin' 🎶

🎼Goin' 🎵Na🎶 na-na-na-na-na~🎶 na-na-na-na🎵 na-na-na-na-na🎶

I have a serious problem with Kuratowski's convention for ordered tuples. Specially, the ordered pair (0,0)={{0},{0,0}} ={{0},{0}} ={1,1} ={1}

I'm a mathematician; getting hung up on the minutae is my entire career. Noticing something that doesn't quite make sense and figuring out why my intuition doesn't match what I've been told is what makes me good at what I do. If there's anything about an explanation that doesn't make sense, I need to assume the entire thing is wrong until I can establish otherwise.

"Undercover"?