Laticauda @ Laticauda @lemmy.ca

Posts

0

Comments

595

Joined

2 yr. ago

Bro just because something is expensive that doesn't mean it can't be predatory. The game has been "in development" for more than a decade and yet is charging thousands of dollars for equipment, if you can't see the issue with how they're operating then you are either blind or delusional.

You very clearly think the system can be fixed and that it’s not the issue itself.

Nowhere in my comment did I say any combination of those words, I very explicitly said that the system is the issue in the first sentence I wrote, and then reiterated that several times throughout the comment. The fact that you have to try to conjure up an imaginary argument from me that I didn't make in the first place is not helping your case.

And believe it or not, improvement of a flawed system can in itself be a step towards abolishing said system. But something tells me someone like you can't grasp that concept.

Free to play games with even a sliver of integrity only charge money for stuff like cosmetics, not for important shit or equipment, and I have never ever seen a free to play game charge over 1k for anything ever, let alone fucking 48k, so spare me the "pretending this is unusual" crap. I sure other games that pull this shit exist, but don't act like it isn't ridiculous or fucked up or like it's somehow completely normal. It's predatory leeching is what it is.

This game could be the second coming of Jesus, Robin Williams, and Mr. Rogers all in one and it still wouldn't excuse the shit the devs have pulled. This isn't a case where its reputation will be fixed with an amazing final product. The moment you charge thousands of dollars for fictional video game ships in an unfinished video game that has been in development for more than a decade is the moment you cross a moral event horizon as developers and can never recover your reputation as anything other than leeches. This game will never have a good reputation, it could jerk you off to the tune of the Imperial March and it would still be worth less than a glamorous prostitute. At least a prostitute would charge more appropriately for their services.

No ship should cost any real world money to buy. If the stuff you can buy in a game with real world money can give you an advantage over other players or unlock parts of the game faster than players who don't pay real money for it, then it's meaningless to say the game itself is "only 45$". The ships make up a huge chunk of the game and you can pay 48k to obtain them all immediately, or rather, not you because statistically speaking you're probably poor, so you don't get the same game for 45 dollars, not unless you want to spend a fucking loooooooooooooong time grinding in-game (based on what I've seen the time needed to grind for enough money to buy even one high class ship is ridiculous). Meanwhile richer players get to fly in circles around you in their better more expensive ships from the start. You get access to less of the game than them.

Also, 1.2k for a single video game spaceship in a game that hasn't even been officially released yet is disgustingly predatory enough on its own.

The fact that you can buy any ship in the game with real world money at all is the problem.

These people are paying to remove that part of the game which blows my mind

Yeah for people who actually enjoy putting the work in it doesn't make much sense, but for some people who play video games it's not about the getting it's about the having. The problem is that in this case they can use real world money to have better stuff without having to work for it, giving them an advantage over other players who are poor or don't want to pay for their ships. If this was 48k for just ship skins and it didn't affect gameplay at all then it'd be pretty stupid still, but I would at least concede that the average person doesn't have any disadvantages if they only pay the 45$ for the main game and don't need to pay thousands of dollars to reasonably compete with players who have bigger wallets and less impulse control. But that doesn't seem to be the case here since different ships have different stats and abilities afaik. This essentially means that rich people (or gambling addicts which are their own can of worms) can unlock more of the game and perform better faster than people who only pay for the base game.

That is literally the opposite of what I said so thanks for proving that you weren't paying attention at all.

As far as I'm aware gravity doesn't directly act on portals so I don't think they would experience acceleration from Gravity themselves. Though I was thinking about it more in terms of general relativity rather than Newtonian gravity.

Worm Jesus is about to be crucified.

They can move at a constant speed in a constant direction, but the acceleration would break them.

Theoretically you can if they're moving in a constant direction at a constant speed a la an inertial frame.

The kid's big-ass head had me questioning it too lmao.

Apparently it costs up to 48k to get certain ships, so that means absolutely fucking nothing.

This isn't real money is it? Please tell me it isn't. I don't play this game but that would just be fucking sad.

Having a degree doesn't prevent him from being a charlatan.

Sad to see you've missed the point entirely and are just using them as toothless buzzwords.

Tbh I've only ever seen this trope happen on tv. In real life whenever I see women wearing the same outfit they're like "omg we match!!"

It applies to a systemic issue not to individuals, that's the entire point, we say there's no good cops because the good cops aren't given a voice and are silenced or pushed out by the justice system. If a cop seeks to actively fight against or improve the system and manages to do so visibly then they are helping to combat the systemic issues that result in a society that needs sayings like "acab" and "no such thing as a good cop". Cops actually doing shit to address a problem by campaigning is the ideal result of pushing those messages, it's the louder more obvious pushback against that system that we want to actually see from cops. It misses the point and defeats the purpose to use those sayings and terms maliciously just to shoot down specific public figures who are actually trying to do something. They're best used as political slogans in response to "bu-but some cops are good people" quibbling when fighting for police reform, so they actually serve a purpose, rather than just being mindless whining.

Now if he gets into office and doesn't actually use his position to enact any improvements? Then by all means acab away, but otherwise you're not helping at all.

Although the original commenter's mileage may vary considering they complained about too much grinding, so I don't think their issue is with the game being too easy.

You can change options to remove animations and speed up dialogue.