Keep in mind that I have no idea what I'm talking about.
So, the final form of the game meat should be that of small cubes. Boil it separately whole or large chunks in water with a slight pinch of salt and a cup of rice. Once the rice is nice and soft, get the meat, dice it, stir fry it in a tea spoon of olive oil or butter and some sauce of preferred taste, then stew as usual. Add some green stuff or dried green stuff towards the end.
Very important. Do not add that rice to the stew. If you want to, boil some separately and add that second one. The first rice is full of bad stuff and should be thrown away. We only used it to massage the meat.
If you have any kind of pickled vegetables, have some as a side dish.
It's good that you're not sure. Most indigenous pops weren't buddy-buddy with each other, no matter the region. And haters gonna hate. So, raid and pillage for whatever reason. Boom! Civilization gone.
Yes, hello. As an uninvolved person, I would like to say that I was tempted to join the fun simply because it was there, regardless of the request not to.
Sadly, I had no popcorn readily at hand and so had to refrain from stoking the fire.
You are quite correct that these threads attract drama lovers, regardless of background, and it does create more hassle for those trying to maintain order.
Perhaps a one-sided instance-wide announcement, notification or message for users from its admins might be coded in as an option if possible?
Though, then again, that might create a wave of posts asking about what happened and such...
Some level of interaction is needed for these kind of things. The problem is figuring out how to balance them at reasonable levels to avoid exhaustion.
Perhaps an automated bot that temporarily bans users from other instances? Sounds like a fun thing to have around for admins.
Regardless, as long as the windows are open, buzzing flies will always show up sooner or later.
Depends on the interpretation. Do you interpret it as a threat? Or is it just a statement based on the context? Language is interesting like that. We can pick and choose the meaning of words to fit our own point of view.
So you ask the question because the meaning isn't clear. If I clarify that it's not, then you begin to consider another meaning by process of elimination. But if I don't, then that initial choice of meaning solidifies and the question becomes a statement from your point of view.
Other people would have assumed directly it was a threat, reported me and possibly add some rather scathing remarks for good measure.
And that's really the point of it, that there's all kinds of people out in the world. Some are better, some are worse. Which side of the road do we walk when the worse start shooting? Or do we just stand aside and watch?
It's not a matter of when trouble arrives at your door, because there is still a chance it never might. It's more of a matter about you do to prevent it from reaching that far. How many neighbors can you save? And should you?
The /s is not needed. I was quite impressed to hear that EA Sports is one of the main money makers of EA despite having each new game as a buggier version of a previous one, only with an updated roster. I had no idea they were so popular and the last FIFA I played properly was in 2003.
So we are out there and we do think like that.
You sure? What if he's a true believer? A political liar is better than the latter because he swings according to the voters. A true believer will go to the ends of the world for his faith.
The day that ethical behaviour puts food on your table and pays your bills is the day that society will agree with you.
Having ethics is nice, doesn't keep you alive though.
Tatorshire